Skip to main content
iRubric: Lab Report rubric

iRubric: Lab Report rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Lab Report 
Rubric Code: XX8XA22
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Chemistry  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Lab Report Rubric
  Not shown

0 pts

Poor

1 pts

Good

2 pts

Excellent

3 pts

Aim
3 pts

One or two sentences describing what the main objective of this lab is.

Not shown

Incomplete aim or no aim included.
Poor

Aim does not clearly describe the main objective of the lab.
Good

Aim attempts to describe the main objective of the lab but not totally clear or not using appropriate content vocabulary.
Excellent

Aim clearly describes the main objective of the lab using appropriate content vocabulary.
Equipment
3 pts

Detailed list of equipment needed for this experiment.

Not shown

No equipment section included.
Poor

Equipment list is not complete.
Good

Equipment list is complete but some words are incorrectly spelt.
Excellent

Equipment list is complete and words are properly spelt.
Methods
6 pts

Description of the steps needed to perform the experiment. Steps are described in full sentences with correct spelling. Steps are clearly described and organised in a logical way.

Not shown

No methods section included.
Poor

Methods section is not complete or not organised in a logical manner. It would not enable a scientist to repeat the experiment correctly.
Good

The Methods section is well described but lacks clarity in places and contains incorrectly spelt or grammatically incorrect sentences. Despite of this, a scientist should be able to repeat the experiment by reading this Methods section.
Excellent

The steps in the Methods section are described in full sentences with correct spelling. Steps are clearly described and organised in a logical way. A scientist would easily be able to repeat the experiment by reading this Methods section.
Hypothesis (prediction)
3 pts

A reasonable hypothesis (prediction) about the outcome of this lab.

Not shown

No hypothesis included.
Poor

Hypothesis is not complete, does not related to aim, or is not logical (testable).
Good

Hypothesis is included. It is a testable prediction and it is related to the aim of the experiment. The hypothesis is not expressed in a full sentence or contains spelling or grammatical errors.
Excellent

Hypothesis is included. It is a testable prediction and it is related to the aim of the experiment. It is expressed in one or two error-free sentences.
Results
6 pts

A drawing of the experimental setup before and after the experiment is provided. Detailed observations are given (colour change, temperature change, etc.)

Not shown

Incomplete drawings and observations, or none included.
Poor

Drawings are not complete or clear enough. Observations are not complete or not organised in a logical manner.
Good

Drawings are clear enough to help understand how the experiment was performed, but labels could have been included to make them clearer.
Observations are complete.
Excellent

Drawings help understand how the experiment was performed, and they include labels to help the reader.
Observations are complete and organised in a logical manner.
Discussion
6 pts

The word equation of the chemical reaction is mentioned with the proper notation. The word equation is translated in English to show understanding of the reaction. The limitations and problems that occurred during the experiment are discussed.

Not shown

Incomplete discussion or none included.
Poor

The student does not show a clear understanding of the experiment.
The word equation is not included and/or not appropriately translated in sentences.
Good

The student shows a partial understanding of the experiment. An attempt to write the word equation and to translated it into English sentences has been made but contains a few mistakes.
Excellent

The student shows a thorough understanding of the experiment.
The word equation of the chemical reaction is mentioned with the proper notation. The word equation is translated in English to show understanding of the reaction. The limitations and problems that occurred during the experiment are discussed.
Conclusion
3 pts

Aim and hypothesis of the lab are repeated and commented upon. Laboratory errors and suggestions for improvements are stated.

Not shown

Incomplete conclusion or none included.
Poor

Conclusion is not complete or not organised in a logical manner.
Good

Conclusion is complete, organised in a logical manner, but contains a few errors.
Excellent

Conclusion is complete, organised in a logical manner, with no errors.
References
3 pts

Sources of material used to help write this lab report are included.

Not shown

No references included.
Poor

References are not complete.
Good

References are mentioned but they are listed in the text instead of being listed at the end of the report.
Excellent

A list of reference is mentioned at the end of the report.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98