iRubric: Science Experiment Curriculum Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Science Experiment Curriculum Project

Your final project is a collection of your experiments, vocabulary terms, web site resources and videos. These resources can be used to teach your students about science and how it relates to food. Using those resources you will create a curriculum or training that will fit the needs of your audience and setting.

Rubric Code: X96C7A

By Ksecinaro

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: (none)

Curriculum
	Needs Improvement 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Description of Curriculum	Needs Improvement -No intended audience -Objects unclear -Unclear how objectives will be achieved	Fair -Directed at appropriate audience -Outlines objectives of project.	Good -Directed at appropriate audience -Clearly outlines objectives of project -Briefly describes how objectives will be achieved.	Excellent -Directed at appropriate audience -Clearly outlines objectives of project -Briefly describes how objectives will be achieved. -Explains how this will benefit students. -Clear and Concise
Quantity of Experiments	Needs Improvement -Less than 4 experiments outlined in curriculum	Fair -Outlined 4 experiments -Did not include all required information for each experiment	Good -Outlined 4 experiments -Included all required information for each experiment	Excellent -Outlined more than 4 experiments -Included all required information for each experiment.
Format of Experiments	Needs Improvement -Missing more than 2 required elements	Fair -Missing 1-2 required elements	Good -Includes all of the following: Name of experiment Grade level Application to standards/competencies Objective Time needed to complete the experiment Helpful background information Equipment and supplies Procedures Observations and questions Answers to question *Student worksheets (if applicable)	Excellent -Experiments are written in a clear and concise manner. -Outline is clear and easy to follow. -Includes all of the following: Name of experiment Grade level Application to standards/competencies Objective Time needed to complete the experiment Helpful background information Equipment and supplies Procedures Observations and questions Answers to question *Student worksheets (if applicable)
Vocabulary Terms	Needs Improvement -Terms were not specific to chosen topic	Fair -Terms listed were applicable to topic but were not well defined.	Good -Terms listed were applicable to topic and well defined	Excellent -Terms listed were applicable to topic and were well defined. -Terms were also used throughout experiment description so students can see them in context.
Resource Page	Needs Improvement -No resource page was included.	Fair -Resource page included -Websites listed were not applicable to topic or not credible sites.	Good -Resource page included -Websites listed were applicable to topic and are credible sites.	Excellent -Resource page included -Websites listed were applicable to topic and are credible sites. -Websites listed will enhance the student's learning experience.
Discussion Blog
	Needs Improvement 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Posting Timeliness	Needs Improvement -Posted presentation more than a day late	Fair -Posted presentation one day late	Good -Posted presentation by midnight on due date	Excellent -Posted presentation by noon on due date (allowing other students more time to review and comment on the presentation)
Timeliness of Response Post	Needs Improvement -Failed to comment on other presentations	Fair -Posted comments on other's presentations one or more days late	Good -Posted comments on other's presentations by noon on due date	Excellent -Posted comments on other's presentations by midnight on night before due date.
Quality of Response Posts	Needs Improvement -Failed to comment on other presentations	Fair -Comments on other's presentations were brief and not well thought out.	Good -Comments on other's presentations were thoughtful.	Excellent -Comments on other's presentations were thoughtful -Provided helpful feedback.
Posting Quantitiy	Needs Improvement -Failed to comment on other presentations	Fair -Failed to comment on every presentation	Good -Posted at least one comment per presentation	Excellent -Posted at least one comment per presentation -Responded to comments on own presentation

Subjects:

Education

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric