Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Annotated Bibliography rubric

iRubric: Annotated Bibliography rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Annotated Bibliography Annotated Bibliography Selection and critique of literature related to course work Rubric Code: X58A3A By dsundinh Draft Public Rubric Subject: Health Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Enter rubric title Enter rubric description
	High Distinction 10 pts	Distinction 8 pts	Credit 6 pts	Pass 4 pts	Below average 2 pts	Fail 0 pts
Introduction Student discusses topic to form basis of annotated biobliography, giving clear rationale for this choice. The topic is clearly relevant to the student's practice and/ or studies.	High Distinction The introductionprovides a clear rationale for the choice of topic engages the reader and creates interest. The topic is clearly highly relevant to the speciality. The purpose of the paper is clear.	Distinction The introduction adequately explains the background and rational for chosen topic but may lack detail or argument. The topic is relevant to the specialty. States the intention of the paper.	Credit The introduction identifies the topic and some background information is presented. The topic is relevant to the nursing specialty. The intention of the paper is stated but may be broad or unfocused.	Pass The topic is relevant to the nursing specialty or may be generally relevant to speciality. Rationale for subject choice is vague. The intention of the paper is stated but is unclear, broad & unfocused	Below average .Background details are a random collection of information, unclear and not related to the topic. The topic may or may not have relevance to the specialty. Purpose of paper is vague or unclear.	Fail Student does not provide an introduction to the assignment
Search Strategy There is a clear outline of the steps and decsions followed while searching for the articles finally included in the assignment.	High Distinction Discussion of search strategy clearly and succinctly outlines the databases, accessed, the keywords and selection criteria used. Strategy is focussed, relevant and clearly effective.	Distinction Thorough, clear Discussion of search strategy; key elements clearly and succinctly outlined and described. Strategy is focussed, relevant and clearly effective.	Credit Adequate discussion of search strategy and key elements. Strategy is focussed, relevant and clearly effective.	Pass Adequate discussion of search strategy and key elements. Discussion requires more focus & clarity to gain a credit.	Below average Discussion of search strategy misses key elements (eg. no mention of keywords or selestion criteria). Discussion lacks focus and/ or relevance.	Fail No effort to discuss or outline search strategy.
Analysis and critique Enter description	High Distinction Analysis and critique of topic evident throughout. The paper displays critical thinking and avoids simplistic description or summary of the information. Demonstrates a level of synthesis and evaluation.	Distinction Findings are considered but not necessarily connected. While there is some description, there is also an appropriate level of critical thinking and analysis of the evidence. Considers the application of synthesis & evaluation.	Credit There is more description than critical thinking or analysis. Some evidence does not support points or may appear inappropriate. Appropriate amount of literature cited.	Pass The paper describes some papers sourced and may discuss either their strengths or weakness. Quotes may be used, but with little evidence of analysis to support their relationship to the key content of the paper. There are a few links to clinical practice. Limited amount of literature cited	Below average There is general failure to support statements or evidence presented. There is no attempt made to critique the literature sourced or link to clinical practice. Work is descriptive with no evidence of analysis. Inadequate amount of literature cited.	Fail There has been no effort to appraise the articles
Conclusion ?Summarise the key points of the research process and findings including a concluding statement of the quality of the research and how it can be used to support evidence based practice.	High Distinction A clear, well reasoned synthesis of the findings of the reviews is presented including a clear statement on the quality of the research findings and their contribution to practice.	Distinction Conclusion clearly and succintly summarises the key points of the review of research process and findings. A clear statement on the quality of the research findings and their contribution to practice is included.	Credit There is more description than critical thinking or analysis and synthesis. The conclusion alludes to contributions to practice but does not make clear statements.	Pass The conclusion describes/ summarises the findings of their review rather than synthesising (integrating) the critique to demonstrate understanding. Limited discussion of applicatin of the findings of critique.	Below average The conclusion describes/ summarises the findings of their review rather than synthesising (integrating) the critique to demonstrate understanding. There is no discussion of applicatin of the findings of critique.	Fail No conclusion has been provided.
Academic Literacy	High Distinction Mainly error free	Distinction Mainly error free.	Credit Occasional problems with spelling or grammar. and/or Occasional poor sentence or paragraph structure	Pass Recurring problems with spelling mistakes or grammatical errors. and/or Recurring problems with sentence, paragraph and/or assessment item structure.	Below average Recurring problems with spelling mistakes or grammatical errors. and/or Recurring problems with sentence, paragraph and/or assessment item structure.	Fail Major problems throughout with many spelling mistakes or grammatical errors. and/or Incoherent sentence structure, little or no paragraph and/or assessment item structure
Academic Intergity	High Distinction Mainly error free.	Distinction Mainly error free.	Credit Mainly error free.	Pass Minor problems with referencing in reference list or in-text referencing.	Below average Sources not acknowledged or APA referencing not used or More than 10 per cent direct quotes May incur SACO referral	Fail Sources not acknowledged or APA referencing not used or More than 10 per cent direct quotes May incur SACO referral

Keywords:

appraisal, bibliography, critique

Subjects:

Health

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Health rubrics

More Assignment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n98