Skip to main content

iRubric: Case Summary Rubric RSA 517

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Case Summary Rubric RSA 517 
Assignment is to summarize the assigned case given in the course.
Rubric Code: X4A729
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Law  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Case Summary
  Outstanding

4 pts

Very Good

3 pts

Satisfactory

2 pts

Below Average

1 pts

Well Below Average

0 pts

Case name and citation

Outstanding

Identifies case name, legal citation and court in the correct format with no spelling, punctuation or any other errors.
Very Good

Identifies all three items, case name, citation and court but makes one or two minor errors.
Satisfactory

Identifies only two of the three required items in the correct format with one minor error or identifies all three items but makes a few minor errors.
Below Average

Only identifies one of the three required items.
Well Below Average

Does not identify the case name, citation or court.
Key Facts

Outstanding

Identifies all relevant facts and presents them in an organized, concise, chronological manner.

Few extraneous facts and includes the current status of the case.
Very Good

Identifies all relevant facts but does not present them in an organized, concise or chronological manner.

Few extraneous facts and includes the current status of the case.
Satisfactory

Fails to identify all the relevant facts but presents some of the relevant facts in an organized manner with some extraneous facts.

Includes the current status of the case.
Below Average

Identifies facts but most of them are extraneous facts.

Missing many relevant facts. May also be missing the current status of the case.
Well Below Average

Does not identify any relevant facts in the case.
Issues to be Decided

Outstanding

Issue & legal question(s) correctly identified and is/are stated in the form of a question.

they are concise and stands on its own if removed.
Very Good

Issue & legal question(s) correctly identified and is/are stated in the form of a question, but may contain extraneous information. Not sufficiently succint and brief.

Issue stands on its own if removed.
Satisfactory

Issue & legal question is/are correctly identified but not stated in the form of a question and may not stand on its own.
Below Average

Issue & legal question(s) is/are not completely or correctly identified. Identifies other issues, some of which are not relevant.
Well Below Average

No issues identified.
The issue(s) is/are the specific legal questions before the court.
Decision of the Court

Outstanding

A correct re-statement of the court's answers to the legal questions posed before and they are answered in the affirmative or negative
Very Good

Partially incomplete or complete answers to the legal questions posed and stated in the affirmative or negative re-statements.
Satisfactory

Mostly Incomplete or partially incorrect answers to the legal questions and they are posed in affirmative or negative.
Below Average

Incorrect answers to the legal questions posed and did not re-state in question in the affirmative or negtive.
Well Below Average

Provided no answer to the questions posed in the issues section.

The answers should have been placed in the affirmative or negative restatement
Reasoning of the Court

Outstanding

Correctly identifies the court's analysis and reasoning and does so in an organized, concise and well written manner.
Very Good

the reasoning of the legal question & answer contains minor weaknesses, but is basically cogent and accords with the court's reasons for ruling the way it did.
Satisfactory

the summary of the legal question or answer contains major weaknesses, is absent or incoherent about why the court answered the way it did
Below Average

Attempt was made to provide a summary; however it didn't relate to any legal question or answer raised by the court.
Well Below Average

did not provide a summary of the court's reasoning or rationale for the answers to the legal questions.
Doesn't answer why the court answered the way it did.
Spelling, Grammar, Format

Outstanding

Spelling is perfect, contains no major grammatical error. Formatting is correct.
Very Good

Spelling is very good with one or two minor errors, some grammatical errors but nothing which affects the understanding of what is written. Formatting is correct.
Satisfactory

Several spelling errors and at least one major grammatical error. Formatting may contain mistakes.
Below Average

Numerous spelling errors throughout, some grammatical erros which affect the understanding of what is written. Several formatting mistakes.
Well Below Average

Riddled with spelling errors, numerous grammatical errors which make understanding what is written very difficult or impossible. No real attempt at formatting.




Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243