Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Talent Show Judging rubric

iRubric: Talent Show Judging rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Talent Show Judging Talent Show Judging Rubric Code: X2XA438 By aarathi Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Music Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 6-8, Post Graduate

Talent Show Judging Criteria made to assist all the judges with their decisions on their ratings for each performer.
	Excellent! An effort that exceeds expectations and is just brilliant! 40 pts	Good An overall good effort, that perhaps needs some minor adjustments. 30 pts	Fair/ Needs Work A satisfying effort, that could be better. 20 pts	Poor/Not Acceptable Not a very good effort, a lot of work is needed. 10 pts
Overall Performance A judgement on the contestant's ability to present original material that draws a positive response from the audience with personality, originality and poise.	Excellent! FANTASTIC! Performer(s) achieved all expectations and, performance was neat and appeared to be well rehearsed and organized and just fabulous on the whole!	Good Very entertaining, the performance was fun and carried out very well, although they might have had a few minor errors or things that could be improved but overall it was still sensational!	Fair/ Needs Work The performance could be better but over all it was slightly amusing and contestants put forth a good effort.	Poor/Not Acceptable The performance was quite boring, although performers in the execution have great potential. Also there were multiple improvements that could have been made.
Audience Response This judgement is not based solely on the final applause after the performance, Rather, it is judged based on the ability of the contestant to draw the audience into the performance, eliciting a positive response.	Excellent! The crowd loved the performer(s) and the performers loved the crowd! The performer(s) beautifully drew the crowd in, and earned a wonderful response from the audience.	Good The performance drew the audience in therefore The crowd is enjoyed the performance. The performance received a good positive response from the crowd.	Fair/ Needs Work The performance caught the crowd's attention to some degree, and received a fairly positive response from the audience in return.	Poor/Not Acceptable The performer(s) doesn't draw the audience in at all in the performance. Therefore, the audience is not amused, in fact they appear quite bored.
Stage Appearance and Presence A judgement on the performer(s) attitude, including their originality personality, confidence, their eye contact with the audience and professionalism (their reaction to mistakes, giggling during the performance, etc.) Also a judgement on their overall appearance's display.	Excellent! The performer(s) presented themselves very neatly, cleanly, and in character, with a lot of confidence, personality and originality. Also they had good eye contact with the audience. They just gave off a very upbeat and amusing vibe. They exceeded expectations.	Good The performers(s) presented themselves neatly and cleanly, and in character. They were original and showcased confidence and personality and had good eye contact with the audience.	Fair/ Needs Work The performer(s) presented themselves slightly neatly, and cleanly, and in character. Little personality, confidence and originality was showcased, along with, some eye contact towards the audience. There is room for improvement.	Poor/Not Acceptable The performer(s) presented themselves unorganized and messy. Sometimes they weren't in character. Along with that no, or very small amounts of personality, originality and confidence was shown. Also, there was barely any eye contact if any, and there is a lot of room for improvement.
Originality The performer(s) ability to create a piece of work that is distinctive or different from the other performers. It takes creativity, ingenuity, confidence and personality to present an original piece.	Excellent! The performance showcased originality, it had new material that wasn't seen before and that was distinctive from the other performances. Overall it was mind-blowing!	Good The performance was very original, and the work was distinctive among the other performances. Although one or two things could be described as cliche.	Fair/ Needs Work Some material in the performance were original and showcased creativity although few things have been repeated, along with that, a few adjustments are necessary.	Poor/Not Acceptable The performance had many aspects of things that have been done before. Overall it wasn't very original and new.
Personality A judgement on whether or not the performer(s) personality is displayed through out the performance.	Excellent! Personality naturally came through!	Good Personality was recognizable.	Fair/ Needs Work There was a slight show of personality but still some major improvements were needed.	Poor/Not Acceptable No personality at all was shown in the performance.
Creativity A judgement based on the creativity of the performer(s). For example did the performers have creative dance moves or were creative signs added to the performance?	Excellent! Act was completely creative and unique. The act ROCKED!	Good The performance was creative.	Fair/ Needs Work There were some aspects of creativity in the performance.	Poor/Not Acceptable The performance exhibits very little creativity whatsoever.
Organization/Coordination This is a judgement on purely the organization of the performance. For example, was the spacing off in the performance, or were words forgotten in the performance, or were dancers coordinated?	Excellent! Act was completely organized and coordinated. The performance appeared to be well rehearsed.	Good Act was organized and coordinated almost fully. Act still needed some tweaking. The act showed potential. The performance appeared to have been practiced a few times.	Fair/ Needs Work Act had some organization and coordination. Although, improvement was still required. The performance seemed to be slightly rehearsed.	Poor/Not Acceptable Act lacked organization and coordination. The performance seemed like it wasn't too rehearsed.

Subjects:

Music

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Music rubrics

More Presentation rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n16