iRubric: Human Dev Project: Activity 4 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Human Dev Project: Activity 4

Human Dev Project: Activity 5

Vygotsky's ZPD and Scaffolding

Rubric Code: X2A358

By mthompsonprice

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Psychology

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

HDP: Activity 4
	Not so much 0 pts	Fair 0.5 pts	Good 0.75 pts	Legit 1 pts
Clarity	Not so much Writing is not clear. Meaning is difficult to understand. May be excessively wordy.	Fair Several organizational issues. May be too wordy. Several important concepts are not explained.	Good A few org. issues; somewhat wordy. A few important concepts are not well explained.	Legit Clearly written, well-organized, not too wordy. All important concepts explained well and accurately.
Dev. Approp. Activity Selection	Not so much Activity selection seems developmentally inappropriate for participant - activity selection is not defended. No activity description provided.	Fair Activity selection seems somewhat inappropriate for participant - activity selection is somewhat defended. Very little activity description provided.	Good Activity selection seems somewhat inappropriate for participant - activity selection is somewhat defended. Some activity instructions/description provided.	Legit Activity selected for the participant is developmentally appropriate for age/grade level and participant skill. Activity is something that the child does not already know how to do. Activity well-implemented. Complete activity instructions provided.
Follows Directions/Vocabulary	Not so much Clearly did not follow project directions. Missing multiple parts of the project (instructor will list missing parts when giving feedback)	Fair Follows all directions for this project but has some difficulty assessing outcomes based on observation of student task performance. ex. 2+ vocabulary terms incorrectly applied or explained; 2+ vocabulary terms missing	Good Follows all directions for this project but has some difficulty assessing outcomes based on observation of student task performance. ex. 1 vocabulary term incorrectly applied or explained; vocabulary missing	Legit Follows all directions for this project: Vygotsky vocabulary used correctly and includes Zone of Proximal Development, collaborative, scaffold(ing)
Compare/Contrast	Not so much Does not describe first and second attempts; Does not compare/contrast first attempt to second attempt	Fair Adequate description of first and second attempt but does not compare/contrast	Good Complete description of first and second attempt but comparison of the two attempts is somewhat lacking	Legit Complete description of first and second attempts and thorough comparison of the two attempts
Composition	Not so much Multiple Errors - not Professional Writing 12+ errors	Fair Needs Proofreading 8-11 errors	Good Needs Proofreading 4-7 errors	Legit Professional Writing 0-3 errors

Subjects:

Psychology

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric