Skip to main content

iRubric: Chemical Emergency Fian rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Chemical Emergency Fian 
Rubric Code: WXXW6X8
By MTrees
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Chemical Emergency Plan
Final Project Rubric
  Good

Meets and or Exceeds Standards

3 pts

Fair

Acceptable

2 pts

Poor

Needs Much Improvement

1 pts

Fluency

Fluency and accuracy of information found through online research and used in articles
Good

Information found and used from internet research for the articles and the final project was all correct, from credible sources, and correctly cited.
Fair

Information found and used from internet research for the articles and the final project was all correct and from credible sources.
Poor

The information found and used from internet research for the articles and the final project was mostly correct, or may have been missing key parts.
Creativity/Orginality

Originality and creative use of technology applications
Good

Technology was used in an creative and original way to produce articles and a final project about chemical action planning.
Fair

Technology was used was in a creative and original way to produce a final project about chemical action planning.
Poor

Technology was not used in a creative way in either articles or the final project about chemical action planning.
Completeness of Project

Objectives completed through article assignments and final project
Good

All objectives were addressed by the group throughout the project, and can be seen in the articles made and final project
Fair

Almost all of the objectives were addressed by the group with one or two incomplete or missing articles.
Poor

Many objectives were missed by the group with multiple incomplete or missing articles and/or final project
Collaboration

How well did the group members work as a team
Good

Group was able to work together smoothly without any major confrontations. Group members listen to, shared, and supported one another's ideas. Tasks were divided among members and reflect multiple authors conjoining on one project.
Fair

Group was able to work together smoothly most of the time with only a few confrontations. Group members sometimes listened to, shared, and supported one another. Task were divided, but one or two persons' contributions were visibly larger than other group members.
Poor

The group was not able to work together, and did not listen, share, and support each other. One or two peoples contributions were were much larger than other group members, and tasks weren't not divided equally.
Time Management

How did each group handle deadlines
Good

Uses time well throughout the entire project. The group does not have to change deadlines, and for the most part does not change responsibilities.
Fair

Mostly uses their time well, but may have been late on an item or two. Overall it did not cause group to have to change deadlines, or change responsibilities much.
Poor

Does not use time well, and was either late or did not participate in projects. The group had to change responsibilities and deadlines often.
Quality of Contribution

Each group members personal contribution
Good

Completed each task to best of their ability, and was a valuable member to the team. Contributed to the group meeting all deadlines on assignments, and it can be clearly seen instances of this person's work in the project.
Fair

Completed each task to the best of their ability. Caused the group to not meet a deadline, but instances of of this person's work in the project can still be seen.
Poor

Completed some tasks, and caused the group to change responsibilities and deadlines. Instances of this person's work can not be clearly seen.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243