Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Logical Fallacies Project rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Logical Fallacies Project
A three part assignment to show understanding of logical fallacies in media, advertising and politics.
Rubric Code:
WX9C5B3
By
jordanj24
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
Journalism
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Enter rubric title
Fair
0 pts
Good
12 pts
Excellent
20 pts
Commercial
Fair
Met two or less of the requirements for an excellent.
Good
Met at least three of the requirements for an excellent.
Excellent
1) Commercial clearly displayed product, or logo if product isn't tangible 2) Fell within guideline of 45-90 seconds. 3) Contained 10 logical fallacies that were used properly. 4) Script flowed logically and did not seem forced. 5) Paper outlining content was accurate and easy to follow.
Speech/Debate
Fair
Met two or less of the requirements for an excellent.
Good
Met at least three of the requirements for an excellent.
Excellent
1) Speech or debate was written to clearly show candidate(s) views on issues. 2) Fell within the guidelines of 45-90 seconds. 3) Contained 10 logical fallacies that were properly used. 4) Script flowed logically and did not seem forced. 5) Paper outlining content was accurate and easy to follow.
Article
Fair
Met two or less of the requirements for an excellent.
(SPELLING/GRAMMAR/WORD USAGE ERRORS ARE ONE POINT EACH AFTER THE FIRST ONE)
Good
Met at least three of the requirements for an excellent.
(SPELLING/GRAMMAR/WORD USAGE ERRORS ARE ONE POINT EACH AFTER THE FIRST ONE)
Excellent
1) Article was written in proper journalistic format. 2) Article was at least 300 words. 3) Contained 10 logical fallacies that were properly used. 4) ZERO spelling/grammar/word usage issues. 5) Paper outlining content was accurate and easy to follow.
Group Effort/Cohesiveness
Fair
Met two or less of the requirements for an excellent.
Good
Met at least three of the requirements for an excellent.
Excellent
1)All deadlines were met. 2)Group remained on task and needed little to no redirecting.3) An obvious team environment was present throughout. 4)All parts were complete and met the objectives. 5)The group took responsibility for any shortcomings and blaming individuals members was not an issue.
Peer Review
Fair
Peer reviews are 20% of your grade and will be given on an individual basis. If the part you are responsible for lacks quality to the point of complete failure, yet your group members give you great reviews, I will assign my own review. Moral of the story is be honest in your reviews. Being off task will be noted and taken from your individual grade.
Good
Peer reviews are 20% of your grade and will be given on an individual basis. If the part you are responsible for lacks quality to the point of complete failure, yet your group members give you great reviews, I will assign my own review. Moral of the story is be honest in your reviews. Being off task will be noted and taken from your individual grade.
Excellent
Peer reviews are 20% of your grade and will be given on an individual basis. If the part you are responsible for lacks quality to the point of complete failure, yet your group members give you great reviews, I will assign my own review. Moral of the story is be honest in your reviews. Being off task will be noted and taken from your individual grade.
Subjects:
Journalism
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Journalism rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.