Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Classical/Baroque Composer Presentation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Classical/Baroque Composer Presentation
Rubric Code:
WX8B966
By
miketribe
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
History
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Baroque/Classical Composer
100 %
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Factual Content
20 %
Poor
Some knowledge presented, but this is largely "undigested" and is not always relevant; evidence of "copy/paste" approach; limited evidence of research. Limited understanding evident.
Fair
Adequate evidence of relevant knowledge, some of it expressed in "own words"; evidence of adequate research. Sometimes not well explained to audience.
Good
Good evidence of relevant knowledge mostly expressed in "own words"; evidence of significant research. Generally well understood by presenters and audience.
Excellent
The information presented was accurate and complete without being too detailed. The information presented was clearly well understood by the presenters and not just copy/pasted from the internet. The information presented was clearly understood by the audience. There was clear evidence of wide research.
Analysis
20 %
Poor
There is no analysis
Fair
There is an attempt at analysis aimed at answering the key questions, but it is weak and generally unsupported
Good
There is a sustained attempt at analysis aimed at answering the key questions and this is generally successful, although it may lack depth/supporting evidence.
Excellent
There is a sustained and in-depth analysis of the key questions which produces clear and well-supported answers.
Presentation Skills
10 %
Poor
Little evidence of preparation; little or no attention to presentation skills; no audience participation
Fair
Some evidence of presentation skills (eye contact, varied tone, etc). Little attempt to encourage audience participation. Mostly clearly explained.
Good
Good evidence of presentations skills (eye contact, varied tone, etc) Some attempt to encourage audience participation. Clearly explained.
Excellent
The presentation was clearly and confidently presented. The presenters were you
well-prepared and seemed to have practiced their presentation beforehand. Presenters explained their material clearly. Presenters skilfully used presentation
skills such as eye contact and varied tone to engage the audience. Presenters encouraged
audience participation through asking questions, etc.
Reflection
10 %
Poor
The reflection showed little though or evidence.
Fair
The reflection showed some thought about the purpose of the project and how well/badly this had been achieved; some of the reflection lacked depth and/or supporting evidence; the self-assessment and peer assessment lacked depth and/or evidence.
Good
The individual reflection made some good points but was sometimes superficial and lacking in development/explanation/evidence; the self-assessment and the assessment of classmates' contributions could have been better supported and more extensive.
Excellent
The individual refection was thoughtful and complete; the assessment of classmates' contributions and the self-assessment were honest and appropriate, and supported by specific evidence.
Slide quality
10 %
Poor
The slides and crowded and difficult to read. There is no visual material. Links do not work well.
Fair
The slides are sometimes crowded and difficult to read; there is a lack of visual material; some of the links do not work
Good
Slides are not crowded and are easy to read; there is appropriate visual material; the slides are generally pleasing to look at; the links all work.
Excellent
Exemplary work. Exceeds expectations.
Group Work
10 %
Poor
Group was not observed to be working well together during class time; there was little effective division of work in the presentation.
Fair
Group was observed to be working well most of the time during class time with some lapses; not all members were on task and using their time wisely; there was some attempt to divide up the work during the presentation
Good
The group worked consistently well during class time and there was clear evidence of combined effort and cooperation; all group members remained on task consistently.
Excellent
There was clear evidence of constructive leadership and division of tasks; all group members clearly knew what they were supposed to be doing at all times; during the presentation itself, each group member participated fully and effectively.
Music Choice
10 %
Poor
The choice of music did not follow the criteria set.
Fair
The music did meet the criteria set but could have been more varied and/or more suitable to illustrate different aspects of the composer's work.
Good
The music met all the requirements set and effectively illustrated different aspects of the composer's work.
Excellent
The choice of music was imaginative and fully illustrated the most important aspects/characteristics of the composer's work.
Overall Impression
10 %
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
Subjects:
History
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More History rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.