- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Paw Print Staff evaluation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Paw Print Staff evaluation Evaluation of group members staff members evaluate one others participation Rubric Code: WACW96 By szaffiro Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Journalism Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Paw Print Staff Evaluation
	Other 1 pts	Poor 2 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 4 pts	excellent 5 pts
attendance	Other Misses and does not try to catch up on work.	Poor Misses 3 or more classes	Fair misses 2 classes	Good misses 1 class	excellent Doesn't miss any classes
staff participation	Other Does not give anything to the project.	Poor Misses some group meetings and doesn't participate in class discussions.	Fair Attends group meetings and sometimes participates in class discussions.	Good Attends most group meetings and participates in most class discussions.	excellent Attends all group meetings and actively participates in class discussions.
work completed	Other Has not worked on the project.	Poor Does not complete assignments given or required for group project on time.	Fair Completes some assignments given or required for group project on time.	Good Completes most assignments given by or required for group project on time.	excellent Completes all assignments given or required for group project on/before time.
position requirements	Other Did not do any of the requirements for his/her positon	Poor Completed work handed in on time does not meet requirements.	Fair Completed some work that meets the requirements of his/her position.	Good Met requirements of staff position, but did not attempt to go above and beyond.	excellent Met and exceeded expectations for a person holding his/her position on staff.
Attitude	Other The individual did not want to help with the project.	Poor The individual wanted to be included in the group, but was usually off topic.	Fair The individual participated in the group little. They waited to be told what to do next.	Good The individual participated in the group in a positive manner. The completed all work on time and helped others.	excellent The individual was a leader in the group, either by consensus or work ethic. He/She carried a huge part of the group responsibility.