Skip to main content

iRubric: Identity Package rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Identity Package

Rubric Code: W44795

By reecea

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Unity 40 % How do the new pieces relate to the original piece?
	Dreadful The quality of work is far below the minimum standard. 0 pts	Poor The quality of the work is below the minimum acceptable standard. 5 pts	Acceptable The quality of the work is average; acceptable, but unimpressive. 8 pts	Exceeds Expectations The quality of the work produced exceeds the average. 9 pts	Outstanding The quality of the work far exceeds the average. Very impressive. 10 pts
Style	Dreadful The style is not at all consistent, looks like 3 independent works.	Poor The styling is very inconsistent, much imagination or explanation is needed to see the relationship.	Acceptable The style is somwhat consistent, some imagination or explanation is needed to see the intended relationship.	Exceeds Expectations The style is consistent, common elements are visible among all three works.	Outstanding The style is very consistent, common elements are clearly displayed among all three works.
Colors	Dreadful The colors are not at all consistent, looks like 3 independent works.	Poor The colors are very in consistent, much imagination or explanation is needed to see the relationship.	Acceptable The colors are somwhat consistent, some imagination or explanation is needed to see the intended relationship.	Exceeds Expectations The colors are consistent, common elements are visible among all three works.	Outstanding The colors are very consistent, common elements are clearly displayed among all three works.
Originality 15 % How much thought went into the design's concept, regardless of execution?
	Dreadful The quality of work is far below the minimum standard. 0 pts	Poor The quality of the work is below the minimum acceptable standard. 5 pts	Acceptable The quality of the work is average; acceptable, but unimpressive. 8 pts	Exceeds Expectations The quality of the work produced exceeds the average. 9 pts	Outstanding The quality of the work far exceeds the average. Very impressive. 10 pts
Quality of Thought Is the design's concept new and modern or was it derived from a commonly seen idea. Sketches and roughs provide evidence of this.	Dreadful The concept is unclear.	Poor The concept is weak. Often seen and duplicated.	Acceptable The concept meets minimum standards. Unoriginal, clearly derived from an often seen design.	Exceeds Expectations The concept is modern. Somewhat original, but derived from another design.	Outstanding The concept is progressive. Never before seen.
Composition 15 % How well was the design executed from an aesthetic aspect?
	Dreadful The quality of work is far below the minimum standard. 0 pts	Poor The quality of the work is below the minimum acceptable standard. 5 pts	Acceptable The quality of the work is average; acceptable, but unimpressive. 8 pts	Exceeds Expectations The quality of the work produced exceeds the average. 9 pts	Outstanding The quality of the work far exceeds the average. Very impressive. 10 pts
Overall Design How well does the design work? Is communication clear? Is it pleasing to the eye?	Dreadful The design is poor. The message is confusing due to the composition. It is unpleasant to view.	Poor The design is unclear and the message is hindered by the composition. It is uninteresting to look at.	Acceptable The message is clear but is unsupported by the design. The design is not unpleasant but is uninteresting.	Exceeds Expectations The message is clear and supported by the composition. The design is pleasing to view.	Outstanding The design is of the highest quality. The message is enhanced by the composition. The design is pleasing to view.
Typography Was the typeface(s) appropriate for the design? Did it's expressive quality enhance the design?	Dreadful The typeface seriously detracts from the visual message. Too much variety, difficult to read. Thoughtlessly chosen.	Poor The typeface interferes with the visual message. Difficult to read. Variety is acceptable. Thoughtlessly chosen.	Acceptable The typeface does not interfere with the visual message but does not support it either. Variety is acceptable. Little thought went into its selection.	Exceeds Expectations The typeface supports the message, but is stereotypical and expected. Easy to read. Appropriate variety. Thoughtfully chosen.	Outstanding The typeface supports the visual message, is not stereotypical. Easy to read. Appropriate variety. Thoughtfully chosen.
Color Theory Did the colors work well with the design, follow color theory rules, avoid pure hues?	Dreadful The colors did not support the design. No evidence of color theory rules. Too many pure hues.	Poor The colors did not support the design. Some evidence of color theory rules. Too many pure hues.	Acceptable The colors supported the design. Some evidence of color theory rules. Some pure hues were used.	Exceeds Expectations The colors supported the design. Pure hues were avoided. Strong understanding of color theory.	Outstanding The colors enhanced the design. Pure hues were avoided. Clearly shows a thoughtful selection of colors.
Workmanship 30 % How well was the design executed from a technical aspect?
	Dreadful The quality of work is far below the minimum standard. 0 pts	Poor The quality of the work is below the minimum acceptable standard. 5 pts	Acceptable The quality of the work is average; acceptable, but unimpressive. 8 pts	Exceeds Expectations The quality of the work produced exceeds the average. 9 pts	Outstanding The quality of the work far exceeds the average. Very impressive. 10 pts
Overall Quality How well was the design executed?	Dreadful The design was poorly executed. Sloppy work throughout.	Poor The design needed more work. Some problems could have been corrected with moderate effort.	Acceptable The design demonstrated quality work with minimal errors. Some problems could have been corrected with only minimal effort.	Exceeds Expectations The design demonstrated high quality work.	Outstanding The design demonstrated near professional level workmanship.
Technical Quality How well were the tools used?	Dreadful The design demonstrates a serious lack of understanding of the basic tools.	Poor The design demonstrates a lack of understanding of the tools. More practice with the basic tools is warranted.	Acceptable The design demonstrates a basic understanding of the tools. Using more advanced techniques would have improved the design.	Exceeds Expectations The design demonstrates an advanced understanding of the basic tools. Student has experimented/attempted advanced techniques.	Outstanding The design demonstrates an advanced understanding of the tools . Advanced techniques were successfully used in new ways and pushed the envelope.
Attention to Detail	Dreadful The design has many errors. Sloppy work, no attention to detail.	Poor The design has some serious mistakes that should have been corrected.	Acceptable The design has some minor mistakes. No attempt was made at correcting the mistakes.	Exceeds Expectations The design has some minor mistakes. A visible attempt was made to correct the mistakes , but failed.	Outstanding The design has no detectable mistakes. Great care was taken with the small details.

Subjects:

Arts and Design

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Arts and Design rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n224