iRubric: Mock Trial Critical Thought Response rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Mock Trial Critical Thought Response

Group Wiki

Rubric Code: W3X274

By plreichel

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Group Project
	Below Effort at this level is less than expected and is graded as D or F 1 pts	Meets Effort at this level represents what is expected and is graded as C or B- 3 pts	Exceeds Effort at this level is greater than expected and is graded as B+ or A 5 pts
Introduction A brief introduction identifies the paper's organization and content	Below The paper lacks an introduction or provides one that gives the reader no useful information about the paper's structure or content.	Meets The introduction provides basic information that allows the reader to correctly anticipate the paper's organization and content.	Exceeds In an especially creative and informative way, the introduction clearly identifies the paper's organization and content.
Four Videos Information from the four videos is included	Below Fewer than three of the videos are discussed in the paper, or are discussed in a very superficial or irrelevant manner.	Meets At least three of the videos are mentioned in the paper and are discussed in a manner relevant to course material.	Exceeds All four videos are incorporated into the paper's discussion of course material in an especially creative and relevant way.
Mock Trial Information from the mock trial is included	Below Reference to the mock trial is not made or is discussed in a very superficial or irrelevant manner.	Meets Reference to the mock trial is included in the paper and is discussed in a manner relevant to course material.	Exceeds Several references to the mock trials are incorporated into the paper's discussion of course material in an especially creative and relevant way.
Textbook Information from the textbook is included	Below Reference to the textbook is not made or is discussed in a very superficial or irrelevant manner.	Meets Reference to the textbook is made in the paper and comments are discussed in a manner relevant to course material.	Exceeds Several references to the textbook are incorporated into the paper's discussion of course material in an especially creative and relevant way.
Strengths/Weaknesses Statement as to strengths and weakness of both systems in included	Below Comments about strengths and weakness of each adjudication type are missing or are provided in a superficial or irrelevant manner.	Meets Strengths and weakness of each adjudication type are discussed in a competent and relevant manner.	Exceeds Drawing on examples from the video, mock trials, and textbook, the strengths and weakness of each adjudication type are presented in a thorough manner.
Jargon Appropriate terms and concepts are used	Below The absence of relevant jargon or concepts, or the incorrect us of either, suggests the author has minimal knowledge of the discipline and its terminology.	Meets In several parts of the paper the author is able to show an understanding of--and ability to use--some key jargon and concepts.	Exceeds By making appropriate use of CRJ jargon and concepts throughout the paper, the author shows an excellent understanding and ability to use discipline terminology and content
Summary A brief summary of the paper's content is included	Below The paper lacks a summary or provides one that gives the reader no useful information about the author's conclusions.	Meets The summary provides basic information that reviews the paper's content and notes any conclusions drawn by the author.	Exceeds In an especially creative and informative way, the summary clearly reviews the paper's content and conclusions.

Subjects:

Social Sciences

Types:

Discuss this rubric