iRubric: Data Management & Human Geography rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Data Management & Human Geography

Culminating activity using Excel with Statistics to formulated possible scenarios by manipulating data.

Rubric Code: W2W9239

By rcspcs

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Math

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: 6-8

Data Management & Human Geography
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Procedural Knowledge	Poor Student shows minimal understanding of the relevant concepts and/or processes. (Excel)	Fair The student demonstrates that there are gaps in his/her conceptual understanding. (Excel)	Good The student demonstrates understanding of major concepts even though he/she overlooks or misunderstands less important ideas or details. (Excel)	Excellent The student demonstrates in-depth understanding of the relevant concepts and/or processes. (Excel)
Representation	Poor The student completes few of the important components of the task. (Excel)	Fair The student completes some important components of the task. (Excel)	Good The student completes most important components of the task. (Excel)	Excellent The student completes all important components of the task. Where appropriate, the student chooses more efficient and/or sophisticated processes. (Excel)
Thinking/Inquiry	Poor The student is unable to generate strategy or answer may display only recall. Answer lacks clear communication or thought process.	Fair The student is able to generate a partial strategy and shows some gaps in their thought process and reasoning.	Good The student generates a competent strategy and shows progression in their thought process and reasoning.	Excellent The student develops an effective strategy and adeptly shows thoughtful inquiry and reasoning throughout the assignment.
Communication	Poor The student either does not use or misuses the terminology. The graphs are either not included or incomplete.	Fair The student uses terminology inconsistently. His/her graphs and charts are not directly related and do not support the explanations.	Good The student uses terminology correctly. The graphs are related to the subject. The student conveys their opinion but is not supported in the work provided.	Excellent The student communicates his/her thinking effectively to the audience. The details fit and make sense, showing organization. The students position is supported through the graphs prepared.