Skip to main content
iRubric: Soap Note Grading Rubric

iRubric: Soap Note Grading Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Soap Note Grading Rubric 
Rubric designed to evaluate soap notes by graduate nursing students
Rubric Code: VXBX5XB
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Nursing  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Soap Note Grading Rubric
  Exceptional

5 pts

Above Average

4 pts

Average

3 pts

Below Average

2 pts

Score

(N/A)

Subjective

Exceptional

Subjective assessment of health status is fully explicated<BR>
CC and HPI are targeted toward the reason for presentation without the inclusion of extraneous information.<BR>
CC is succinct.<BR>
HPI is fully developed (e.g., includes thorough symptom analysis and/or other features appropriate for the reason for presentation.<BR>
Elements of the PMH, FH, and ROS that expand on the CC and HPI are included
Above Average

Subjective assessment is missing 1 element needed for adequate evaluation of the patient's problem.
Average

Subjective assessment is missing 2 elements needed for adequate evaluation of the patient's problem. Includes irrelevant information.
Below Average

Subjective assessment is missing more than 2 critical elements needed for adequate evaluation of the patient's problem. Irrelevant information predominates subjective assessment
Score
Objective

Exceptional

Objective assessment of health status is fully explicated<BR>
Physical exam includes vital signs, height and weight for all children and for others as appropriate, any relevant developmental data related to assessment of CC, and objective findings relevant to CC and supporting of Assessment and Plan.<BR>
Appropriate diagnostic tests are performed/ordered.
Above Average

Objective assessment is missing an element needed for adequate evaluation of the patient's problem.<BR>
Includes irrelevant information<BR>
Selection of diagnostic tests is too broad or expensive for evaluating the presenting problem OR<BR>
Selection of diagnostic tests is inadequate to address the presenting problem
Average

Two or more elements needed for adequate evaluation of a patient's problem is missing from the subjective and/or objective assessment.<BR>
Selection of diagnostic tests is inappropriate for CC or is missing when needed.
Below Average

Objective assessment is not developed and/or the assessment is inappropriate for the patient's age, gender, and/or inappropriate for the presenting problem.
Score
Diagnoses

Exceptional

Complete problem list is generated and rationally prioritized. <BR> No extraneous information or issues are listed.<BR> An optimal and thorough assessment is present for each problem. <BR> Diagnoses reflect application of best clinical evidence to subjective and objective assessments. <BR>
Above Average

Problem list is missing one element, or is inappropriately prioritized, but diagnoses are well supported by subjective and objective assessment.
Average

Problem list is missing one element, or is inappropriately prioritized, and diagnoses are not sufficiently supported by subjective and objective assessment.
Below Average

Diagnoses are inappropriate or unsupported by subjective and objective assessment
Score
Plan

Exceptional

Plan is coherent and complete and accurately addresses identified problem(s).<BR> Plan reflects best clinical evidence. <BR> Plan is patient-centered and reflects interprofessional collaboration. <BR>
Plan includes plans for evaluation/follow-up care as appropriate. <BR> Plan is individualized to the patient's age, development, culture, religion, family, environment, education, and psychosocial concerns. <BR> Plan is economically sound. <BR>
Above Average

Plan is appropriate and meets above criteria but is "generic" rather than individualized to the patient.
Average

Plan is inadequate to fully address the identified problem.expansive or overwhelming for the client or healthcare system OR<BR>
Needs to consider alternative features for optimal outcomes
Below Average

Plan is inappropriate, lacking essential components related to final diagnoses, or neglects patient education and follow-up.
Score
Evidence

Exceptional

Identification of evidence-based guidelines to assessment, diagnosis, plan, patient education, and/or follow-up, with appropriate application of evidence, indicating rationale(s) for implementation and considering patient preferences.
Above Average

Includes only one minor error in the application or omission of evidence-based guidelines to assessment, diagnosis, plan, patient education, or follow-up
Average

Includes 2 or more omissions or errors in application of evidence-based guidelines to assessment, diagnosis, plan, patient education, or follow-up
Below Average

Incorrectly or fails to apply evidence-based guidelines to assesment, diagnosis, plan, patient education, or follow-up.
Score
Documentation

Exceptional

Documentation is well organized and correctly formatted.<BR>
Language is clear with appropriate medical terminology. <BR>
No redundant, extraneous, or distracting information. <BR>
Narratives have a logical flow.
Above Average

Documentation generally meets criteria for "exceptional" with minor errors in SOAP formatting or occasional redundant or extraneous information. <BR> Documentation meets criteria for clarity but needs to be better organized.<BR>
Average

Documentation meets criteria for clarity but needs to be better organized.<BR>
Documentation occasionally strays from standard format for SOAP documentation.<BR>
Narratives such as the HPI and Exam occasionally stray from logical sequence but the reader is able to determine findings with minimal difficulty.
Below Average

Documentation does not meet expectations for the graduate level as evidenced by any of the following:<BR>
incorrect formatting, lay terminology, illogical sequencing, missing essential elements, and/or more than 2 spelling or grammatical errors.
Score
Identifying information

Exceptional

Includes introductory statement giving an overview of the patient including age, race, gender, reason for presentation.
Above Average

Gives partial description of the patient (3 elements)
Average

Gives partial description (2 elements)
Below Average

Includes HIPPA violation by including protected health information
Score
Education

Exceptional

Education is culturally appropriate, cost effective and manageable, contains components that are manageable for the patient. Caregiver is involved in instruction. Caregiver resources such as education, training, transportation is included.
Above Average

Education is culturally appropriate but unachievable due to various reasons such as access, economics, transportation. Caregiver resources are considered.
Average

Education is not culturally appropriate, is generic and limited to the patient. Caregiver not involved
Below Average

Education is inappropriate to the assessment, is not culturally appropriate and is unachievable.
Score





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98