iRubric: Final Animation Project rubric

Detailed planning and storyboarding. A script for the narration was provided for the entire story.

Animation was well planned. The storyboard and script was followed for the most part. Final Animation could have been slightly better if more detailed planning was done.

Storyboard and script provided a general idea that was not followed closely. Final Animation could have been better if more detailed planning was done.

Inadequate planning caused animation to be too short or to be confusing.

No storyboard or script was turned in.

2:30 to 3:30 in length

2:15 - 2:30 OR 3:30 - 3:45 in length

2:00 - 2:14 OR 3:46 - 4:00 in length

1:30 - 1:59 OR 4:01 - 4:15 in length

Less than 1:30 minutes or longer than 4:16 in length

The final project quality exemplifies the outstanding skills of the students in the group.

The final project quality exemplifies the above average skills of the students in the group.

The final project quality exemplifies the average skills of the students in the group.

The final project quality exemplifies the poor skills of the students in the group.

The final project quality exemplifies the limited or non-existant skills of the students in the group.

1. The project was completed by more than TWO members.
2. The work load and variety of work on each member seems fair.
3. The leadership role being assumed by each member for different tasks is evident.
4. The group used allotted class time well and productively.

1. The project was completed by more than TWO members.
2. The work load and variety of work on each member seems fair.
3. The leadership role being assumed by each member for different tasks is NOT apparent.
4. The group used some of the allotted class time well and productively.

1. The project was completed by more than TWO members.
2. The work load and variety of work on each member does not seem fair, or at least one member has been assigned a trivial non-technical task (such as report writing).
3. The leadership role is unclear.
4. The group occasionally used allotted class time and productively.

1. The project was completed TWO members.
2. The work load and variety of work on each member does not seem fair, or at least one member has been assigned a trivial non-technical task (such as report writing).
3. The leadership role is unclear.
4. The group did not used allotted class time well and productively.

1. The project was completed only ONE team member.
2. The work load and variety of work was not distributed evenly. The bulk of the assignment was up to one or two persons in the group to complete.
3.There is no leadership role evident during group work time.
4. The group seldom used allotted class time as expected with productivity towards the final project.