- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: UAV Design rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
UAV Design Aircraft Design Design of an UAV to deliver an epi-pen. Rubric Code: VX75XCW By christymckinzie Draft Public Rubric Subject: Engineering Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Aircraft Design
	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts	Missing 0 pts
Power	Good The Power Source is drawn, labeled and explained. There is an explanation of why that power source is the best choice for the challenge.	Fair The Power Source is drawn, labeled and partially explained. There is an explanation of why that power source is the best choice for the challenge.	Poor Some explanation of how the UAV is powered is included.	Missing
Control	Good How the UAV is being controlled is drawn, labeled and explained. There is an explanation of why that choice for control is the best choice for the challenge.	Fair How the UAV is being controlled is drawn, labeled and partially explained. There is an explanation of why that choice for control is the best choice for the challenge.	Poor Some explanation of how the UAV is controlled is included.	Missing
Deliverable	Good The method for carrying the Epi-pen is drawn, labeled and explained. How the Epi-pen will be transferred to Outback Joe is accurately explained.	Fair The method for carrying the Epi-pen is drawn, labeled and explained. How the Epi-pen will be transferred to Outback Joe is explained.	Poor Method is included but totally explained.	Missing
Connections	Good Explanation of how all parts of the UAV interact with one another to allow for the movement and delivery of the Epi-pen.	Fair Explanation of how parts of the UAV interact with one another to allow for the movement and delivery of the Epi-pen.	Poor Some connections are explained.	Missing
General	Good Basic information of the UAV is included, labelled, color coded and explained. For example...type of UAV, materials used, type of power. Sources are included	Fair Design is neat, color coded, labeled with some explanation. Sources included.	Poor Design, labeling and some color coding. Sources included.	Missing No sources or missing.