iRubric: Peer Evaluation Group Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Peer Evaluation Group Project

Each group member will evaluate themselves and the other members in the group on their effectiveness in the group presentation.

Rubric Code: V833X3

By karimillerttm

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: 9-12

Peer Evaluation
	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Time Managment	Good Student was never distracted. Stayed on task all of the time and worked diligently on both their slide and group presentation. Ensured presentation was cohesive.	Fair Student was rarely distracted. Stayed on task the majority of the time. Worked harder on their slide than the group presentation. Unconcerned about cohesiveness of group presentation.	Poor Student often distracted. Kind of worked on both their slide and the group presentation. Did not take a lot of responsibility for either.
Level of Engagement	Good Student always had something positive to contribute by sharing ideas, asking questions or making plans.	Fair Student usually had something to contribute by sharing ideas, asking questions, or making plans.	Poor Student rarely contributed to the group presentation. Seemed like they would like everyone else to do the work and did not contribute by sharing ideas, asking questions or making plans.
Preparation	Good Student was organized and prepared each day to work on both their individual slide but also the group presentation.	Fair Student usually was prepared to meet. Usually organized and worked a little bit on both their slide and the group presentation.	Poor Student rarely prepared to meet. Was not focused. Did not seem to care about either their slide or the group presentation.
Team Work	Good Student always worked well with other team members. Often discussed ways to improve the group presentation. Critiqued other's with care and objectivity. Was not bossy nor indifferent. Took criticism as well as gave it.	Fair Student usually worked well with team members. Sometimes would offer suggestions or critique in order to better the presentation. Could be a bit blunt and perhaps bossy at times. Seemed to criticize other's more than be positive.	Poor Student rarely worked well with other team members. Their indifference or criticisms often took away from group presentation. Was not an enjoyable team member.
Individual Slide	Good Student had accurate information. Slide made sense. Was easy to understand. Slide was colorful, was meaningful to group presentation and well organized. Super job, overall. Used image effectively.	Fair Student had good information. Text was somewhat confusing or difficult to read. Enhanced the group presentation more than it hurt it. Had some color and creativity. Images effectiveness questionable.	Poor Student had too little or inaccurate information. Slide tended to hurt group presentation rather than enhance it. Image not used or inappropriate. Student did not seem to care about the presentation.

Subjects:

Social Sciences

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric