iRubric: Mock Trial Rubric

-The definition does not make sense or is very sketchy.
-The brief was incomplete and poorly written.

-Does not have at least four criteria, or the criteria are unimportant or do not make sense.
-The brief was well written with coherent reasoning and competent grammar.

Has at least four criteria that make sense. Criteria are thoughtful and well written and presented.
The brief was well written with coherent reasoning and competent grammar.

-Does not have four reasons, or does not have examples from the research.
-The recommendation does not make sense or is missing guidelines for either defendant or plantiff.

-There are four reasons, but some of them are vague or they do not have specific examples from the research.
-The recommendation does outline what will happen to defendant and what defendant needs to do. However, the recommendation is vague or unclear.

-There are four good reasons with four specific examples of this behavior shown in the research.
-The recommendation has a specific time frame. It outlines any requirements needs to fulfill by defendant if guilty or not.

-Verbally inexpressive
-missed all important points of the trial
-not professional
-The group spent most of the time fooling around and got very little done.

-Verbally adequate
-covers some point of the trial
-professonal, but lacked organization
-Several of the participants did all of the work while others watched.

-Verbally effective
-covers all point of the trial
-professional
-All of the participants worked on the project and contributed to its success.