iRubric: Program Review Validation rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Program Review Validation

This rubric will be used by validation teams to review the unit assessments

Rubric Code: V392XB

By JaniceSilver

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: (Other)

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Unit Assessment Review
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Enrollment Trends requires trend analysis, discussion of factors that affect trends, and development of objectives that address trends	Poor Data/trend analysis weak or missing Discussion of factors that affect trends missing or weak Objectives missing or not related to trends	Fair Data/trend analysis weak General factors that affect trends Objectives loosely related to trends	Good Data/trends analyzed carefully and compared with District Specific factors that affect trends Objectives address trends
Course Completion requires trend analysis, discussion of factors that affect trends, and development of objectives that address trends	Poor Data/trend analysis weak or missing Discussion of factors that affect trends missing or weak Objectives missing or not related to trends	Fair Data/trend analysis weak, loosely based on stats. General factors that affect trends Objectives loosely related to trends	Good Data/trends analyzed carefully and compared with District Specific factors that affect trends Objectives address trends
Certificates and Degrees requires trend analysis, discussion of factors that affect trends, and development of objectives that address trends	Poor Data/trend analysis weak or missing Discussion of factors that affect trends missing or weak Objectives missing or not related to trends	Fair Data/trend analysis weak General factors that affect trends Objectives loosely related to trends	Good Data/trends analyzed carefully and compared with District Specific factors that affect trends Objectives address trends
SLO Update status and recommendations	Poor SLO status addressed weakly or not at all	Fair SLO status addressed	Good SLO status carefully described with timetable for progress
Advisory Board Status and response to recommendations	Poor Advisory Board acknowledged. Recommendations and/or progress missing or weakly addressed	Fair Advisory Board described in general terms Recommendations discussed in general terms, lacking detailed progress	Good Advisory Board described with details such as membership, format and mtg.schedule Committee recommendations identified and progress discussed
FTES requires trend analysis, discussion of factors that affect trends, and development of objectives that address trends	Poor Data/trend analysis weak or missing Discussion of factors that affect trends missing or weak Objectives missing or not related to trends	Fair Data/trend analysis weak, lacking breakdowns General factors that affect trends Objectives loosely related to trends	Good Data/trends analyzed carefully (including online, off campus, etc.)and compared with District Specific factors that affect trends Objectives address trends
FTEF requires trend analysis, discussion of factors that affect trends, and development of objectives that address trends	Poor Trend analysis weak or missing Discussion of factors that affect trends missing or weak Objectives missing or not related to trends	Fair Data/trend analysis weak, lacking breakdowns General factors that affect trends Objectives loosely related to trends	Good Trends analyzed carefully (including reg. hourly, total)and compared with LACCD Specific factors that affect trends Objectives address trends
Average Class Size requires trend analysis, discussion of factors that affect trends, and development of objectives that address trends	Poor Data/trend analysis weak or missing Discussion of factors that affect trends missing or weak Objectives missing or not related to trends	Fair Data/trend analysis weak, lacking breakdowns General factors that affect trends Objectives loosely related to trends	Good Data/trends analyzed carefully including breakdowns, and compared with LACCD Specific factors that affect trends Objectives address trends
Use of Technology Description and objectives	Poor Use of technology description missing Objectives and initiatives missing or unrelated	Fair Use of technology described in general terms Objectives and initiatives general in nature	Good Use of technology described in details Objectives and initiatives related to data
Curriculum Status Table of coursework reflecting currency	Poor Coursework is outdated with no narrative to address timeline for updates	Fair Courses are current or about to expire No narrative of timeline included	Good Courses current or in process of being updated Any out of date courses are addressed in narrative
Unit Plan/Resourse Request	Poor Resource requests lacking backup from data analysis, evaluation, and unit goals	Fair Resource requests based on general evaluations and goals	Good Resource requests based on thoughtful data analysis, evaluation and unit goals

Subjects:

Education

Types:

(Other)

Discuss this rubric