Skip to main content
iRubric: Nutrition and Digestion rubric

iRubric: Nutrition and Digestion rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Nutrition and Digestion 
Nutrition and Digestion
This rubric will be used to assess student work throughout the unit. We will be looking first at building and evaluating healthy meal plans, then moving on the building a digestive system model, and a culminating activity that combines the two and includes a short presentation.
Rubric Code: V229B37
By Coachmcbride
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: K-5

Powered by iRubric Nutrition and Digestion Unit
  Exceeding

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Knowledge and Understanding

Exceeding

Student clearly and consistently demonstrates a thorough understanding and mastery of material and was able to effectively apply their new skills and understanding to the assignment.
Good

Student demonstrates a complete understanding of the material and is able to effectively apply their new skills and understanding to the assignment.
Fair

Student demonstrates some understanding of the material and is able to apply some of their new skills and understanding to the assignment.
Poor

Student demonstrates a limited understanding of the material and is not able to effectively apply their new skills and understanding to the assignment.
Criteria

Exceeding

Student has paid close attention to detail and has met and exceeded all criteria outlined. No requirements are missing, and some additional, relevant items have been added.
Good

Student has paid attention to detail and has met all outlined criteria. All requirements have been covered.
Fair

Student has paid some attention to detail, and has met most of the outlined criteria. Most requirements have been covered.
Poor

Student has paid little to no attention to detail, and has only met some of the outlined criteria. Only a few of the requirements have been covered.
Presentation

Exceeding

Student work was neat, well organized, visually appealing (if applicable), easy to understand, and challenged audience understanding while showing a clear purpose.
Good

Student work was neat, shows organization, visually appealing (if applicable), and the purpose was easy to understand.
Fair

Student work was messy, showed little organization, minimal effort towards visuals (if applicable), and detracted from audience understanding of the purpose.
Poor

Student work was messy, disorganized, with little to no effort towards making the final product visually appealing (if applicable), making it hard for the audience to understand the purpose.
Ideas

Exceeding

Assignment was creative, thoughtful, demonstrated clear understanding, and had ideas added that take the assignment beyond the criteria provided.
Good

Assignment was creative, and demonstrated clear understand, while meeting the elements of the criteria provided.
Fair

Assignment showed some creativity and understanding of the topic while meeting most of the elements of the criteria provided.
Poor

Assignment shows little creativity and limited understanding of the topic, and does not meet elements of the criteria provided.
Spelling

Exceeding

The work was proofread and no visible spelling errors were made
Good

The work appears to be proofread and only a few visible spelling errors were made, which did not take away from audience understanding.
Fair

The work does not appear to be proofread and a few spelling errors were made that take away from audience understanding
Poor

The work does not appear to be proofread and there are many spelling errors made that take away from audience understanding.
References

Exceeding

All information utilized that was not original was cited and included on a reference sheet or as a footnote.
Good

Most information utilized that was not original was cited and included on a reference sheet or as a footnote.
Fair

Some information utilized that was not original was cited and included on a reference sheet or as a footnote.
Poor

Little or no information utilized that was not original was cited and included on a reference sheet or as a footnote.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16