Skip to main content

iRubric: Summer 2019 NU 607 - Phenomenon of Interest (POI) Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Summer 2019 NU 607 - Phenomenon of Interest (POI) Paper 
Examine a Phenomenon of Interest (POI) from a quantitative and qualitative view, and discuss the four patterns of knowing identified by Carper (1978).
Rubric Code: UXC9X84
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Nursing  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Introduction and Thesis Statement
7 %
  Missing

0 pts

Not Met

1 pts

Met

2 pts

NA

0 pts

Introduction and Thesis Statement

Introductory Paragraph and Thesis Statement

1. Introduce the problem/Phenomenon of Interest (POI) you plan to explore in one (1) paragraph.

2. Conclude the introductory paragraph with a direct thesis statement that informs the reader of your purpose, or the primary objective of the paper.

Missing

Student did not address.
Not Met

Minimal or partial information that does not full address the required element; either an introduction or thesis statement may not be included.
Met

The information fully addresses the required content and demonstrates understanding of the POI.
NA
POI, Philosophy, & Ways of Knowing
67 %
  Missing

0 pts

Did not Meet Criteria

1 pts

Met Minimum Criteria

3 pts

Met or Exceeds Criteria

5 pts

Identify and Describe POI

Identity Phenomenon of Interest (POI)

1. Describe your approved POI and its significance to your advanced specialty practice.

2. Justify the importance of the POI using evidential support with current peer-reviewed literature.

3. Include specific statistics and costs related to the POI.

4. Describe the impact of the POI on the overall healthcare system, based on data and statistics.

5. Include at least three (3) current peer-reviewed references in addition to any textbooks.

Missing

Student did not address.
Did not Meet Criteria

The information did not address each of the required elements. Content may not be supported with current peer-reviewed literature.
Met Minimum Criteria

The information was basic and addressed the required content in some manner. Content may not be well supported with peer-reviewed references or may have included less than three (3) current peer reviewed references.
Met or Exceeds Criteria

The information fully addresses the required elements and demonstrates understanding the significance of chosen POI to area of practice. Content is supported with at least three (3) peer-reviewed references published in the last 5-7 years.
Primary Philosophic View

Identify and Describe your Primary Philosophic Viewpoint (Qualitative or Quantitative).

1. Clearly identify your primary (preferred) philosophic viewpoint.

2. Describe how your philosophy influences how you view your chosen POI.

3. Discuss how your philosophy impacts how you seek and evaluate the ‘truth’ regarding your POI.

4. Describe how your philosophy impacts the way you provide care to your patients or population.

5. Include at least two (2) peer-reviewed references in addition to any textbooks.

Missing

Student did not address.
Did not Meet Criteria

The information did not address the required content. Content may not be supported with peer-reviewed literature.
Met Minimum Criteria

The information was basic and addressed the required content in some manner. Content may not be well supported with peer-reviewed references or may have included only one (1) peer reviewed reference.
Met or Exceeds Criteria

The information fully addresses the required elements and demonstrates understanding of the POI though the lens of the primary philosophic view. Content is supported with at least two (2) peer-reviewed references, of which classic literature based on theory may be older than 5-7 years.
Alternative Philosophic View

Identify and Describe your Alternative Philosophic Viewpoint (Qualitative or Quantitative).

1. Clearly identify your alternative philosophic viewpoint.

2. Describe the value of data represented by your alternative philosophic viewpoint.

3. Discuss whether the ‘opposing’ or alternative view is helpful in more fully defining your POI.

4. Describe how you would incorporate this type of information in your advanced nursing practice.

5. Include at least two (2) peer-reviewed references in addition to any textbooks.

Missing

Student did not address.
Did not Meet Criteria

The information did not address the required content. Content may not be well supported with peer-reviewed literature.
Met Minimum Criteria

The information was basic and addressed the majority of required content in some manner. Content may not be well supported with peer reviewed literature.
Met or Exceeds Criteria

The information fully addresses the required elements, and demonstrates understanding of the POI though the lens of the alternative philosophic view. Content is supported with at least two (2) peer-reviewed references, of which classic literature may be older than 5-7 years.
Ways of Knowing

Ways of Knowing in Nursing

1. Summarize the four patterns of knowing described by Carper (1978).

2. Discuss how each of the four patterns of knowing will influence your future advanced practice role.

3. Discuss how you will use the patterns of knowing to seek information needed to care for your patient or population.

4. Support your discussion with at least two (2) peer-reviewed reference, citing primary sources.

Missing

Student did not address.
Did not Meet Criteria

The information did not address the required content. Content may not be supported with peer-reviewed literature.
Met Minimum Criteria

The information was basic and addressed the majority of the required content in some manner. Content may not be well supported with peer-reviewed literature, or may have included only one (1) peer reviewed reference.
Met or Exceeds Criteria

The information fully addresses the required elements, and demonstrates understanding of the four ways of knowing. Content is supported with at least two (2) peer-reviewed references, of which classic literature may be older than 5-7 years.
Conclusion
6 %
  Missing

0 pts

Not Met

1 pts

Met

2 pts

NA

0 pts

Conclusion

Conclusion

1. Summarize the major points of the paper in one (1) paragraph.

2. No new information or references should be included in this section.

Missing

Student did not address.
Not Met

The information did not adequately summarize the major points in the paper. New information or references may have been introduced.
Met

The information fully summarizes the major points in the paper, without including any new information or references.
NA

NA
Scholarship
20 %
  Missing

0 pts

Did not Meet Criteria

2 pts

Met Minimum Criteria

4 pts

Met or Exceeds Criteria

6 pts

Graduate Level Scholarship

Demonstrate Graduate Level Scholarship.

1. Formal, scholarly writing style with no first-person language.

2. Writing should be clear and concise.

3. Organize work by headings

4. Writing should be free of APA errors.

5. Full paper (except reference page, appendices, and attachments) submitted to Turnitin,
with minimal similarity.

6. CON approved format for title page, running head, introduction, and page number.

7. A minimum or nine (9) peer-reviewed references.

8. Citations and references follow APA format.

9. Writing should be free of grammatical and spelling errors.

10. Paper not to exceed nine (9) pages (excluding title page, reference page, and any appendices).

11. Follow all assignment instructions.

12. Demonstrate good overall writing skills.

Missing

Graduate level scholarship missing, with six (6) or more types of errors (the error type may have been repeated multiple times). Faculty discretion will apply.
Did not Meet Criteria

Does not demonstrate graduate level scholarship with four (4) to five (5) types of error (the error type may have been repeated multiple times). Faculty discretion will apply.
Met Minimum Criteria

Demonstrates minimal graduate level scholarship with two (2) to three (3) types of errors (the error type may have been repeated multiple times). Faculty discretion will apply.
Met or Exceeds Criteria

Demonstrates graduate level scholarship with no more than one (1) type of error. Faculty discretion will apply.




Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n224