Skip to main content
  • help_outline help
iRubric: Science Fair rubric

iRubric: Science Fair rubric

 
find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   apply to...   delete   Do more...
Science Fair 
Rubric Code: U3C884
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: (none)


Powered by iRubric Science Fair Judging
Enter rubric description
 

3 pts


2 pts


1 pts

Overall Project Impression
Knowledge gained

SCORE

3

Exhibits a thorough understanding of the topic, has correct answers to questions.
2

Somewhat familiar with topic but cannot answer all questions effectively.
1

Demonstrates little to no knowledge gained nor scientific skills.
Scientific Approach

SCORE

3

Well defined problem and uses a logical, orderly method for problem solving.
2

Adequately defined problem or attempts to follow scientific method, but not both.
1

Little to no evidence of scientific method used.
Independent Variable

SCORE

3

Thoroughly defined.
2

Adequately defined.
1

Have not been defined.
Dependent Variable

SCORE

3

Thoroughly defined.
2

Adequately defined.
1

Have not been defined.
Control Variable

SCORE

3

Thoroughly defined.
2

Adequately defined.
1

Have not been defined.
Reliability of Data

SCORE

3

Numerical and metric with repeated trials for adequate data. Data is reliable.
2

Not numerical or metric and or data collected is marginal.
1

Little or no data collected.
Experimental Error

SCORE

3

Measurement error affecting the conclusion has been considered.
2

Some measurement error affecting the conclusion has been considered.
1

Experimental error has not been considered.
Validity of Conclusion

SCORE

3

The conclusion is consistent w/ the data and/or observations. Based on data collected.
2

Conclusion is present but inconsistent with data.
1

no conclusion or valid conclusion present.
Originality

SCORE

3

Demonstrates a novel approach and/or idea. Highly creative.
2

Some creativity and/or originality is demonstrated.
1

No originality or creativity is demonstrated.
Written Report
Abstract

SCORE

3

Abstract contains concise summary of the purpose, procedures, and conclusion in 200 words or less.
2

One or two parts of the abstract is/are missing or inadequate.
1

Abstract is missing or is entirely inadequate.
Safety Sheet

SCORE

3

Identifies all of the major hazards, precautions taken.
2

Present but does not identify all major hazards, or precautions.
1

Not present.
Title Page/Table of Contents

SCORE

3

Clear and concise with pagination on the table of contents.
2

One or two elements missing.
1

Title page or table of contents missing.
Acknowledgements

SCORE

3

Credit has been given to those who helped w/ the project.
2

1

Acknowledgements are missing.
Purpose & Hypothesis

SCORE

3

The problem has been defined and a prediction has been made.
2

The problem has been defined or a prediction has been made but not both.
1

Neither the problem nor a prediction is present.
Review of Literature

SCORE

3

The R of L is thorough, adequately cited, and relavent to the topic.
2

The R of L is inadequate or citations are missing.
1

Little or no use of citations and R of L is not relevant to the topic.
Materials

SCORE

3

All materials are listed and measurements are in metric.
2

Not all materials are listed or measurements are not in metric.
1

No materials are listed.
Procedure

SCORE

3

Complete and easy to follow, all steps present, in metric if applicable.
2

Procedure is present but not complete or confusing, or measurements not in metric.
1

Procedure is missing.
Results

SCORE

3

Results are organized in tables or graphs. Data is quantitative.
2

Results are less organized, not quantitative, and difficult to understand.
1

Results are not present.
Conclusion

SCORE

3

Conclusion reflects a concise evaluation & interpretation, reference is made to hypothesis and purpose.
2

Conclusion is present but is inconsistent w/ data collected, does not refer to hypothesis or purpose.
1

Conclusion is not present.
Reference List

SCORE

3

Quality and quantity is adequate and current.
2

Quality and quantity is less than adequate, or not current.
1

No reference list
Oral Presentation
Presentation Quality

SCORE

3

Clear presentation, concisely summarizes project.
2

Information is adequate, but presentation is difficult to follow.
1

Information jumbles, irrelevant, presentation is unclear.
Dynamics

SCORE

3

Speaks fluently, has good eye contact, is polite, dynamic, & interested in their project.
2

Moderate eye contact, polite and dynamic.
1

No interest, no eye contact.
Display
Information Experimental

SCORE

3

Complete explaination of the project, includes graphics, charts , or pictures
2

Adequate information present, but not thorough.
1

Missing pertinent information.
Information Technical

SCORE

3

Abstract, safety sheet, and endorsements displayed.
2

One of the required forms is missing
1

The required forms have not been displayed.
Artistic Qualities

SCORE

3

Neat, organized, and appealing. No spelling errors.
2

Neat, not well organized. Spelling errors present.
1

Sloppy and carelessley prepared.
Enter Title

3

2

1





Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2020 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n17