Skip to main content
iRubric: Catholics Making an Impact rubric

iRubric: Catholics Making an Impact rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Catholics Making an Impact 
Research the life and works of a important Catholic figure. Deliver findings to the class in a formal presentation
Rubric Code: U2X3AW7
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Catholics Making an Impact Presentation
Students will research the life and works of an important Catholic person in Australia and deliver an informative presentation on their findings to the class
  Poor

Student has not completed the task to grade level standard

1 pts

Fair

Student has completed the task to grade level standard

2 pts

Good

Student has completed the task to above grade level standard

3 pts

Excellent

Student has completed the task to level significantly above grade level standard

4 pts

Content - factual
3 pts

Adequate and accurate research content covering the topics outlined in the assignment task
- Biographical details, Employment/Voluntary Work, the impact on others of their work

Poor

Content omits 2 or more key topics (of the 3); and/or content is too brief to provide any real understanding of the person for the audience.
Fair

All topics are covered but several are too brief or not clearly explained; or
1 topic omitted
Good

All topics covered in good detail. Some attempts to include interesting facts to engage audience
Excellent

All topics covered. Excellent detail and only relevant and interesting facts to engage audience
Content - Evaluative
5 pts

Explanation and judgments based on researched content:
- How their faith is expressed in their work and life choices; what is admirable about them; Life events that were critical in shaping who they are (if applicable);

Poor

Completes 1 out of 2 or less of the required content; and/or content is too brief to provide any real evidence that presenter has understood subject's purpose, drive and faith experience.
Fair

All topics covered but several not well explained. and/or content is too brief. Presenter explained some of the subject's purpose, drive and faith experience, but at a superficial level.
Good

All topics covered and most well explained. Presenter understood subject's purpose, drive and faith experience in some depth, demonstrating some deeper personal thinking.
Excellent

All topics covered and well explained. Extensive insight shown into the how the subject's faith has impacted their choices and actions.
Presentation Skills - Voice
3 pts

Voice projection, pace and enunciation, expression in the delivery of their research findings

Poor

Much of the speech was difficult to hear due to poor projection, enunciation and/or pace. Voice was monotone.
Fair

The speech was able to be heard effectively most of the time. Issues with projection, enunciation, and/or pace impacted some sections. Voice had some expression at times.
Good

The speech was able to heard effectively all of the time. Issues with projection, enunciation, and/or pace impacted rarely. Variations in expression engaged the audience.
Excellent

The speech was able to heard effectively all of the time. Voice was used to excellent effective to engage the audience, and enhanced the understanding of the content
Presentation Skills - Body
3 pts

Body position and posture (still, facing, front, purposeful gestures) and eye contact in the delivery of their research findings

Poor

Eye contact was limited - speech was read. Body position issues negatively impacted the audience's connection with the content.
Fair

Eye contact was maintained occasionally, or was directed outward but not to individuals. Regular reading from notes.
Some fidgeting or body movements were mildly distracting.
Good

Eye contact was regular and made some connections with individuals. Some reading from notes. Body position was open and gestures were used at times to enhance engagement with the audience.
Excellent

Eye contact was used to connect directly with most individuals in the audience. Notes were referred to but not read from. Body position was open, gestures enhanced connection with the presentation.
Time
2 pts

Speech is 5-8 minutes in length.

Poor

Speech was less than 5 minutes or over 9 minutes
Fair

Speech was between 5-8 minutes, but it was apparent that some irrelevant or unnecessary content was included to extend the time.
Good

Speech was between 5-8 minutes and content was appropriately detailed.
Excellent

N/A
Visuals
1 pts

Presentation is supported by visual aids (print or electronic)

Poor

Visual elements were limited or irrelevant. Lack of care in presentation of visual components.
Fair

Visual elements were relevant to the presentation.
Evidence of some care taken to present quality visuals.
Good

Visual elements were relevant to the presentation.
Evidence of high degree of care taken to present quality visuals to support spoken elements.
Excellent

Visual elements were relevant to the presentation and demonstrate excellence in the degree of care and detail. Visuals chosen greatly enhance comprehension of the presentation.
References
1 pts

Reference list as evidence of resources used

Poor

No reference list supplied
Fair

Reference list supplied but not easy to follow or not well organised
Good

Reference list supplied and easy to follow
Excellent

NA




Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98