Skip to main content

iRubric: EMS Chart review rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
EMS Chart review 
Patient care report QI review
Rubric Code: U2455A5
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Medical  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Patient Care Report
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Very Good

4 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Response Information

Poor

Not completely provided.
Fair

Information provided, however not accurate.
Good

Needed information provided, accurate, with no further information provided.
Very Good

Needed information provided, accurate, and documented in narrative.
Excellent

Needed information provided, accurate, documented in narrative, with additional pertinent specifics documented.
Patient Information

Poor

Critical information is missing without documented explanation.
Fair

Name and date of birth documented. No medical history documented in patient information tab or narrative.
Good

Name, date of birth, and incident specific medical history/medications documented in patient information tab.
Very Good

Name, date of birth, all pertinent medical history/medications documented in patient information tab and narrative.
Excellent

Name, date of birth, and patient belongings documented in patient information tab. Thorough medical history/medications documented in patient information tab and pertinent information in narrative.
Vitals

Poor

None documented or only one set of vitals documented from transports without a documented explanation.
Fair

2 sets of vitals, including blood pressures, documented with no interpretation noted in narrative.
Good

Appropriate sets of vitals documented based on patient acuity with abnormalities discussed in narrative.
Very Good

Appropriate sets of vitals documented based on patient acuity with interpretation provided in narrative. Additional system specific vitals documented (EtCO2, temperature, BGL, etc.).
Excellent

Appropriate sets of vitals documented based on patient acuity with interpretation provided in narrative. Additional system specific vitals documented and interpreted (EtCO2, temperature, BGL, etc.).
Flow Chart/Forms

Poor

If flow chart items involved in the call with no documentation of such.
Fair

Most required items identified in flow chart with no specific information filled out and no documentation of items in narrative.
Good

Required items identified in flow chart with specifics filled out with no documentation of items in narrative.
Very Good

Required items identified in flow chart with specifics filled out, documentation of items in narrative.
Excellent

All items from the incident in flow chart identified with specifics filled out, documentation of items in narrative.
Assessments

Poor

Focused assessments documented poorly, leaving out key pertinent positives and negatives.
Fair

Focused assessments documented, but missing some pertinent information such as pertinent negatives. Assessments documented in both assessments tab and narrative.
Good

Focused assessments documented with reassessment documented in narrative, however not in assessments tab. Pertinent positives documented, with little to no pertinent negatives documented.
Very Good

Focused assessments documented with reassessment documented in both assessments tab and in the narrative. Pertinent positives and negatives documented. Findings support treatments and provider impressions.
Excellent

Focused assessments documented with pertinent positives and negatives. Also documents reassessment in both assessments tab and narrative. Assessment findings clearly support indications for treatment and provider impressions with interpretation of findings elaborated on in narrative.
Provider Impressions

Poor

Primary/secondary impressions not supported by assessment findings and narrative.
Fair

Primary/secondary impressions supported by assessment findings and narrative, however assessment did not rule out other differential diagnoses.
Good

Primary/secondary impressions supported by assessment findings and narrative, however evidence supports other differential diagnoses may be more appropriate.
Very Good

Primary/secondary impressions supported by assessment findings and narrative. Other differential diagnoses ruled out in assessment findings.
Excellent

Primary/secondary impressions supported by assessment findings and narrative. Other differential diagnoses ruled out in assessment findings with evidence documented in narrative.
Narrative

Poor

Discusses the events of the incident without elaborating on patient interview, assessment findings, or treatments.
Fair

Discusses the events of the incident without discussing patient assessment findings or interview.
Good

Provides clear picture of the incident and highlights pertinent assessment findings. Documents treatments with no elaboration of response to treatment.
Very Good

Provides clear picture of the incident. Elaborates on assessment findings and patient interview. Documents treatments and their indications, response to treatment included in PCR.
Excellent

Provides clear picture of the entirety of the incident. Elaborates on assessment findings and patient interview. Describes patient response to treatments. Notates any abnormalities with the incident.
Transport Decision

Poor

Transport decision was inappropriately documented.
Fair

Transport decision was appropriate, however other options should have been considered.
Good

Transport decision was appropriate. No elaboration of other considerations if others were possibly appropriate.
Very Good

Transport decision was the most appropriate. Any other considerations documented.
Excellent

Transport decision was the most appropriate. Discussion of transport decision discussed in narrative.




Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243