iRubric: Human Rights Article #26 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Human Rights Article #26

Students will create a game using classtools.net to make a review tool regarding article #26. Be sure to emphasize the importance of this article for educators.

Rubric Code: U223X87

By sydnierae

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: History

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: (none)

Human Rights Game
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Content Effectiveness	Poor Questions were not relevant to human rights article #26 and were not effective in reviewing. Student did not include any information on why article #26 is significant for educators.	Fair Some questions were relevant and some were effective in reviewing article #26. Some information was included on how article #26 is significant to educators, but was not sufficient.	Good Questions were relevant and effective in reviewing the specific article. Most information included emphasized how article #26 is significant to educators.	Excellent All questions were effective in reviewing article #26. Information included was completely supported with evidence and went beyond the main idea of the article. Student fully understands the significance of article #26 for educators.
Grammar & Spelling	Poor There are multiple spelling and grammar mistakes. No proof-reading occurred.	Fair There are 4+ spelling or grammar mistakes. Proof-reading was inaccurate.	Good There are almost no spelling and grammar mistakes and proof-reading is evident.	Excellent No grammar and spelling mistakes. Student went beyond proof-reading and has an understanding of proper grammar.
Accuracy	Poor The game questions and answers are not accurate and there was no organization. Student did not accurately integrated the technology tool into the assignment.	Fair The game questions and answers are somewhat accurate and is somewhat organized well. Student is close to being accurate in integrating the technology tool into the assignment.	Good The game questions and answers are accurate and the game is well organized and concise. Student accurately integrated the technology tool into the assignment.	Excellent The game questions and answers are accurate and fool proof. No mistakes were made in matching correct answers. The game is completely organized in a progressive way. Student accurately understands how to use the technology tool to integrate it into assignments.
Creative & User Friendly	Poor The game is not creative and nearly impossible to play. Student does not show understanding in the technical program.	Fair The game is somewhat creative and takes time to figure out how to play and use. Student spent some time understanding the technical program.	Good The game is creative and easy to navigate. Student has a basic understanding of the technical application.	Excellent The game is exceptionally creative and easy to navigate. Instructions are included on how to access and play the game in order to maximize review time. Student has full understanding of the technical application.
Overall Understanding	Poor Student does not have an understanding of article #26 and does not demonstrate the significance for educators.	Fair Student has some basic understanding of article #26 and demonstrates some significance for educators.	Good Student has a higher understanding of article #26 and demonstrates the significance for educators.	Excellent Student has an advanced understanding of article #26 and goes beyond to demonstrate the significance for educators.

Subjects:

History

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric