iRubric: JSHS Video Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

JSHS Video Presentation

In order to facilitate high-quality evaluations for acceptance to present at the Connecticut Junior Science and Humanities Symposium, the Executive Committee will require video submissions for all potential presenters. The video will give the Committee a chance to evaluate the student-researcher on a variety of criteria to best determine which projects meet the high-quality standards expected.

Rubric Code: TXX9894

By salmeida

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Science

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12

JSHS Video Presentation (Content)
	15 pts	10 pts	5 pts	SCORE (N/A)
Communication	15 The student-researcher communicates effectively, both orally and through visual aides. Visual aides may include but are not limited to: presentation (e.g. PowerPoint) slides, posters, etc.	10 The student-researcher somewhat communicates effectively, having only few oral or visual aides to strengthen presentation.	5 The student-researcher does not communicate effectively and neither oral or visual aides are used to strengthen the presentations.	SCORE ____/15
Innovation	15 The student clearly explains his or her creative role development and advent of the idea for the project.	10 The student somewhat explains his or her creative role development and advent of the idea for the project.	5 The student does not explain his or her creative role development and advent of the idea for the project.	SCORE ____/15
Collaboration	15 The student-researcher clearly explains his or her self-directed and collaborative work ethic. The student explains who assisted with the project, what role each person played, when and where the research took place, how long the project lasted or is projected to last.	10 Work ethic of the student-researcher is somewhat explained in collaborative terms. It is not clear who assisted with the project, what role each person played, when and where the research took place, how long the project lasted or is projected to last.	5 Work ethic of the student-researcher is not explained in collaborative terms. It is not explained who assisted with the project, what role each person played, when and where the research took place, how long the project lasted or is projected to last.	SCORE ____/15
Information Literacy	15 The student-researcher demonstrates an understanding of relevant, primary-source references as it relates to the project.	10 The student-researcher somewhat demonstrates an understanding of relevant, primary-source references as it relates to the project.	5 The student-researcher does not demonstrate an understanding of relevant, primary-source references as it relates to the project.	SCORE _____/15
Problem solving	15 The student-researcher effectively demonstrates the analysis, synthesis, and evaluative processes that enabled productive problem solving.	10 The student-researcher somewhat demonstrates the analysis, synthesis, and evaluative processes that enabled productive problem solving.	5 The student-researcher does not demonstrate the analysis, synthesis, and evaluative processes that enabled productive problem solving.	SCORE ____/15
Presentation order	15 Presentation is provided in the exact order of: Innovation, Collaboration, Information Literacy, and then Problem Solving	10 N/A	5 N/A	SCORE ____/15
Video Technicalities	15 -Presentation is THREE MINTUES or under -Student Researcher is the only individual visible or audible during presentation. -Student researcher is easy to view and easy to hear -Video is in one of the following formats: .m4v, .avi, .wmv, .mpg, .mpeg, or .mov	10 N/A	5 N/A	SCORE ____/15

Subjects:

Science

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric