Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Peer Review-Group Routine rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Peer Review-Group Routine
Peer Review-Digital Presentations
Students make critical/thoughtful reflections about a peer's work. Also evaluates self & group member for participation of choreography within a group.
Rubric Code:
TXC9XCX
By
Coachmcbride
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Dance
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Final Peer Evaluation
No Response or Disrespect
0 pts
What happened?
5 pts
Needs some work
8 pts
Way to Go!!
10 pts
Response about member 1
name:
No Response or Disrespect
Dancer did not respond to a peer or your (or someone else) response was not kind, courteous, or was disrespectful.Dancer was not an active participant and was difficult to get along within the group.
What happened?
Dancer did not provide much thoughtful considerations for improvement of choreography. Dancer was not an active member and did not hep solve issues. We all had to encourage dancer to participate then would give feedback.
Needs some work
Dancer somewhat provided thoughtful considerations for improvement of this work. Dancer was somewhat active in creating choreography. Could of had a stronger presence in the group.
Way to Go!!
Dancer is kind, courteous, and respectful especially when you(or someone else) are expressing an opposing opinion or suggestions. Dancer was active in creating choreography and giving helpful suggestions.
Response about member 2
name:
No Response or Disrespect
Dancer did not respond to a peer or your (or someone else) response was not kind, courteous, or was disrespectful.Dancer was not an active participant and was difficult to get along within the group.
What happened?
Dancer did not provide much thoughtful considerations for improvement of choreography. Dancer was not an active member and did not hep solve issues. We all had to encourage dancer to participate then would give feedback.
Needs some work
Dancer somewhat provided thoughtful considerations for improvement of this work. Dancer was somewhat active in creating choreography. Could of had a stronger presence in the group.
Way to Go!!
Dancer is kind, courteous, and respectful especially when you(or someone else) are expressing an opposing opinion or suggestions. Dancer was active in creating choreography and giving helpful suggestions.
Response about member 3
name:
No Response or Disrespect
Dancer did not respond to a peer or your (or someone else) response was not kind, courteous, or was disrespectful.Dancer was not an active participant and was difficult to get along within the group.
What happened?
Dancer did not provide much thoughtful considerations for improvement of choreography. Dancer was not an active member and did not hep solve issues. We all had to encourage dancer to participate then would give feedback.
Needs some work
Dancer somewhat provided thoughtful considerations for improvement of this work. Dancer was somewhat active in creating choreography. Could of had a stronger presence in the group.
Way to Go!!
Dancer is kind, courteous, and respectful especially when you(or someone else) are expressing an opposing opinion or suggestions. Dancer was active in creating choreography and giving helpful suggestions.
Response about member 4
name:
No Response or Disrespect
Dancer did not respond to a peer or your (or someone else) response was not kind, courteous, or was disrespectful.Dancer was not an active participant and was difficult to get along within the group.
What happened?
Dancer did not provide much thoughtful considerations for improvement of choreography. Dancer was not an active member and did not hep solve issues. We all had to encourage dancer to participate then would give feedback.
Needs some work
Dancer somewhat provided thoughtful considerations for improvement of this work. Dancer was somewhat active in creating choreography. Could of had a stronger presence in the group.
Way to Go!!
Dancer is kind, courteous, and respectful especially when you(or someone else) are expressing an opposing opinion or suggestions. Dancer was active in creating choreography and giving helpful suggestions.
Response about member 5
name:
No Response or Disrespect
Dancer did not respond to a peer or your (or someone else) response was not kind, courteous, or was disrespectful.Dancer was not an active participant and was difficult to get along within the group.
What happened?
Dancer did not provide much thoughtful considerations for improvement of choreography. Dancer was not an active member and did not hep solve issues. We all had to encourage dancer to participate then would give feedback.
Needs some work
Dancer somewhat provided thoughtful considerations for improvement of this work. Dancer was somewhat active in creating choreography. Could of had a stronger presence in the group.
Way to Go!!
Dancer is kind, courteous, and respectful especially when you(or someone else) are expressing an opposing opinion or suggestions. Dancer was active in creating choreography and giving helpful suggestions.
Response about member 6
name:
No Response or Disrespect
Dancer did not respond to a peer or your (or someone else) response was not kind, courteous, or was disrespectful.Dancer was not an active participant and was difficult to get along within the group.
What happened?
Dancer did not provide much thoughtful considerations for improvement of choreography. Dancer was not an active member and did not hep solve issues. We all had to encourage dancer to participate then would give feedback.
Needs some work
Dancer somewhat provided thoughtful considerations for improvement of this work. Dancer was somewhat active in creating choreography. Could of had a stronger presence in the group.
Way to Go!!
Dancer is kind, courteous, and respectful especially when you(or someone else) are expressing an opposing opinion or suggestions. Dancer was active in creating choreography and giving helpful suggestions.
Quality of Work (Overall)
No Response or Disrespect
Our group did not succeed the final choreography project.
What happened?
Our group could have done a better job! We did not coordinate and work well together.
Needs some work
Our group did a good job, but we could have made better choices to make our group a success.
Way to Go!!
You are completely satisfied with how your group project turned out. It is a true success!
Self evaluation
No Response or Disrespect
I was not an active participant in creating choreography and helpful in problem solving any issues that came up. I did not act as a leader when needed and did not become a team player when following others.
What happened?
I was an active participant in creating choreography and helpful in problem solving any issues that came up. I acted as a leader when needed and became a team player when following others.
Needs some work
I was somewhat of an active participant in creating choreography and helpful in problem solving any issues that came up. I somewhat acted as a leader when needed and became somewhat of a team player when following others.
Way to Go!!
I was an active participant in creating choreography and helpful in problem solving any issues that came up. I acted as a leader when needed and became a team player when following others.
Keywords:
peer review, peer evaluation, self evaluation, reflections, participation
Subjects:
Dance
English
Types:
Project
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Dance rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.