iRubric: Core 105 Museum Assignment rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Core 105 Museum Assignment

The museum assignment offers you a chance to enjoy the variety of ways artists create in the visual arts: pots to prints, furniture to fashion. It is a chance to explores your powers of observation and interpretation in a cultural context.

Rubric Code: TXB84W8

By ATaiter

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Humanities

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Museum Assignment 100 % This is an experience directly with the arts.
	Excellent exceptional exploration of the object 25 pts	Good Generally covers material well. 22 pts	Fair Covers the basic information but not deeply 18 pts	Poor Skips over details that are essential to assignment. 10 pts
Description of Piece 30 % Thoroughness in providing the qualities of the object	Excellent The piece is described in detail: not only dimensions, and physical features, but the context of surrounding pieces and their relevance to the pieces are fully and illustrated in the text-lighting, placement etc.	Good Generally good description and basic information is flushed out beyond the basic. Specifics are used in describing the piece but little consideration is taken in providing information on its surrounds or if it is effectively presented.	Fair General information is provided on the piece such as dimensions but little depth beyond the basic information. Little or no information is provided on the surrounding environment: other pieces, room lighting.	Poor Little information is provided on the piece. Even minimal information such as the materials, dimensions and date are not included.
Historical Context 30 % Where and who (person, culture) is associated with this piece.	Excellent Writing includes demonstrable research beyond the information provided on placard. Research from reliable sources is employed creating a deeper historical research concisely.	Good Writing includes demonstrable research beyond the information provided on placard. Some research from reliable sources is employed.	Fair Historical information is the information provided at the museum on the placard but no other research is employed in the discussion.	Poor Historical information is slim to nil. No sources are provided to substantiate the historical information that you provide.
writing quality 20 % Quality of writing: grammar, punctuation as well as use of citations, proper titling of work. (See “Writing about the Arts” handout.	Excellent Excellent use of writing: grammar, punctuation. Works discussed are referenced and cited properly. including proper footnotes when necessary.	Good Overall proper use of references and style. Uses full sentences, proper grammar. Titles, dates and writing elements are generally ok.	Fair Generally proper writing is employed. Art forms are discussed but writing needs some editing or proofing at times.	Poor Sloppy writing: careless mistakes, spelling, word choices or too informal for a writing assignment.
Artistic Support 20 % Includes music, drawing, and selfie provided.	Excellent Excellent documentation was completely and carefully provided: Selfie with piece, drawing and other documentation of piece, music links or mp3 provided and works, and explanation of music is included in paper.	Good Acceptable presentation of supporting documentation is provided, including selfie, drawing or other documentation. Music is provided as well. Explanation of music is completed.	Fair Presentation of supporting documentation is mostly or even completely supported, but it is rushed or spotty. Selfie is provided,	Poor Supporting material is only partially supplied: Any or all of the following are missing: Selfie, drawing, music.and or explanation of music

Keywords:

writing, arts

Subjects:

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric