Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Engineering Project:3D Print Phone Holder rubric

iRubric: Engineering Project:3D Print Phone Holder rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Engineering Project:3D Print Phone Holder Engineering Project: Pom Pom Catapult Rubric Code: TXAX435 By hswift Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Engineering Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 9-12

Engineering Proj: 3D Print 3D Print Phone Holder
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Needs Improvement 1 pts
Engineering Notebook 50 %
NB: Table of Contents	Excellent Table of contents accurately represents all of the entries in the notebook. Page numbers, titles, and dates are listed for each entry.	Good Table of contents represents most of the entries in the notebook. Page numbers, titles, and dates are occasionally missing. Entries are fairly neat and legible.	Fair able of contents has only occasional entries. Page numbers and/or dates are missing. Entries are barely legible.	Needs Improvement No Table of contents exists/No entries in the Table of contents
NB: Page Titles/Objective	Excellent Page titles are accurately displayed at the top of each page. Titles clearly identify content of each page. Objective clearly written and dated. Entries are neat and legible.	Good Page titles are displayed at the top of each page, but are occasionally missing/inaccurate. Objective fairly clear and dated, however it could use more detail. Entries are fairly neat and legible.	Fair An attempt at page titles is present but inaccurate. Frequent omissions occur. Objective is weak and missing most of the details. Dates may be missing. Entries are barely legible.	Needs Improvement Page titles are missing. Objective is missing. Not dated.
NB: Notebook Entries	Excellent All entries are consistently done in permanent blue or black ink. All entries, figures and calculation are labeled clearly and consistently. Labels and diagram titles are PRINTED and dated.	Good Most entries are done in blue or black permanent ink. Most entries, figures, and calculations are labeled. Labels and diagram titles are PRINTED and dated. Occasional errors are evident	Fair Entries are frequently done in pencil and only occasionally done in permanent ink. An attempt at labeling entries, figures and calculations is evident. Dates are inconsistently listed at the beginning of entries, if at all	Needs Improvement Entries are always done in pencil. No attempt is evident at dating entries and diagram titles.
NB: Added Items	Excellent Items added to the notebook are permanently affixed to a page. Signature or initials are written in ink over the edge of the item.	Good Items added to the notebook are permanently affixed to a page. Signature or initials are missing over the edge of the item.	Fair Items added to the notebook are permanently affixed, but are done sloppily and with little care.	Needs Improvement Items are not permanently affixed to the notebook. OR Items are done sloppily.
NB: Mistakes/Unused Space	Excellent Mistakes and errors are consistently lined out, initialed and corrected. Unused space is consistently X'd or lined out and a signature is present.	Good Mistakes and errors are lined out, initialed and corrected. Unused space is X'd or lined out and a signature is present. Occasional errors of omission are present.	Fair Mistakes and errors are inconsistently or improperly lined out, initialed and corrected. Unused space is occasionally X'd or lined out and a signature is sometimes present. Errors of omission are frequent.	Needs Improvement Clear evidence exists where items have been erased or scribbled out. Unused space is evident without being X'd or lined out.
NB: Pages signed, dated	Excellent Pages are consistently signed and dated by the designer. Witness signatures and dates are also consistently displayed. No errors are evident.	Good Pages are signed and dated by the designer and witness. Occasionally errors of omission by the designer or witness are present.	Fair Some evidence exists that signatures have been attempted by both the designer and witness' Frequent lapses and errors of omission are present.	Needs Improvement No evidence is present that either the designer or a witness has signed and dated pages.
NB: Ideas and Research	Excellent The notebook contains extensive research or idea generation. There are several sketches or pictures documenting the process. The notebook lists all of the constraints and criteria for the current project.	Good The notebook contains some research or idea generation. There are some sketches or pictures documenting the process. The notebook lists some of the constraints and criteria for the current project.	Fair The notebook contains little research or idea generation. There is an inadequate number of sketches or pictures documenting the process. The notebook lists an inadequate numbers of the constraints and criteria for the current project.	Needs Improvement The notebook contains no research or idea generation. There are no sketches or pictures documenting the process. The notebook does not list the constraints and criteria for the current project.
NB: Prototype/Testing	Excellent Notebook contains evidence that testing was completed and meets all specifications identified with complete functionality. This includes complete testing results tables and reflections.	Good Notebook contains some evidence that testing was completed and meets all specifications identified with complete functionality. This includes some testing results tables and reflections.	Fair Notebook contains some evidence that testing was completed and meets all specifications identified with complete functionality. This includes some testing results tables and reflections.	Needs Improvement Notebook does not contain any evidence that testing was completed. There are no testing results tables nor reflections.
Final Product /Presentation 50 %
Final Detail Drawing	Excellent Final detail drawing correctly represents final product. Dimensions are labeled correctly. Views are appropriate and correct. Block lettering is used correctly.	Good Final detail drawing mostly represents final product. Dimensions are mostly labeled correctly. Some views are appropriate and correct. Block lettering is attempted.	Fair Final detail drawing somewhat represents final product. Dimensions are labeled. Some views are present. Block lettering may or may not be attempted.	Needs Improvement A final detail drawing does not exist.
Final Product/3D Print Criteria: - Final design must be original. - Final presented product should be aesthetically pleasing and not wasteful - The holder must be free-standing. - The holder must provide functionality for landscape and portrait. - Final product is a 3D print. ** Bonus: Implement a second added feature. (i.e. not only does it hold your phone, it does ‘x’)	Excellent Final Catapult meets and/or exceeds all stated requirements and constraints.	Good Final Catapult meets most stated requirements and constraints.	Fair Final Catapult meets little to none of the stated requirements and constraints.	Needs Improvement Final Catapult meets none of the stated requirements and constraints.
Communicating Results Criteria: - Presentation must include reasoning behind design (i.e. a pitch, pros & cons, etc.) - Be creative in your presentation - Communicate the design and build process	Excellent Presentation has detailed information; demonstrates full knowledge with explanations and elaborations that enhance presentation. Presents information in logical, interesting sequence that audience can follow.	Good Presentation has adequate topic information. Presents information in logical, interesting sequence that audience can follow.	Fair Presentation lacks sufficient topic information. Audience may have difficulty following presentation because all information is not presented in a logical sequence.	Needs Improvement Presentation does not explain topic sufficiently, and presenter does not have a grasp of the topic. Audience has difficulty following presentation because all information is not presented in a logical sequence.

Keywords:

engineering notebook

Subjects:

Engineering

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Engineering rubrics

More Assessment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n98