Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: CLS Scholarship evaluation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
CLS Scholarship evaluation
Rubric Code:
TX6A5A
By
stalewski
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
(General)
Type:
(Other)
Grade Levels:
6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
CLS Scholarship Evaluation
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Academic record
Poor
Student has not completed substantial for credit work at UWM or academic record is average (<3.0)
Fair
Student has completed substantial for credit work at UWM Academic record is good (3.0-3.5)
Good
Student has completed substantial for credit work at UWM Academic record is exemplary (3.5 + GPA)
Professional goal
Poor
Fair
Student is a major in the CLS program but does not intend to complete CLS professional training. Student is completing graduate education and is not continuing in the UWM graduate program
Good
Student indicates an intention to practice in one of the CLS professions or conduct research in a CLS related field of study
Personal statement
Poor
Student letter is not written in proper letter format or does not answer the questions required by the scholarship application
Fair
Student letter partially answers questions required by the scholarship application
Good
Personal statement letter is written in proper letter format and clearly answers the questions required by the scholarship application
Letters of recommendation
Poor
Letters are generic in nature and do not contribute to the student application
Fair
Letters recommend student for award, but do not clarify student qualifications
Good
Letters speak to the academic and personal qualities of the student. Letters strongly support award for student
Need
Poor
Financial need is not addressed
Fair
Financial need is addressed but does not contribute to the student application
Good
Student has clearly indicated financial need
Community service
Poor
Community service is not documented
Fair
A record of occasional service to the university or larger community is documented
Good
A record of consistent service to the university or larger commhnity is documented
Subjects:
(General)
Types:
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More (General) rubrics
More (Other) rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.