iRubric: Screpanti's rubric for Lend's course

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Screpanti's rubric for Lend's course

Graphic Design

This rubric is to assess the task in Module 4

Rubric Code: TX59A8B

By naomiscrep

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Geography

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: 9-12

Slides planning Graphic Design 1
	Excellent 20 pts	Good 16 pts	Satisfactory 12 pts	Poor 8 pts
PPT slides planning	Excellent The chosen number of slides perfectly fits with the request and the content is well distribuited among the slides.	Good The requests have been quite well distribuited among the chosen number of slides.	Satisfactory The most part of the requests have been accomplished but there is a lack in accuracy.	Poor Requests have not been all accomplished due to lack of space in the PPT or lack of time.
Presentation (graphic design)	Excellent Images and texts are well balanced and really attractive in terms of design in fact their presentation is original, creative and personal. All graphics are related to the given topic.	Good Images and texts are well balanced and related to the topic even if they don't catch the attention very much.	Satisfactory Images and texts are not always well chosen and integrated. Some parts of the texts are developed in a way too simple.	Poor The presentation is very simple and in some parts it is missing of texts or images. It is not attractive at all.
Introduction and general content	Excellent The introduction is complete and interesting. The content is presented in a clear and original way. All the infos are comprehensive and make it easy to understand the tasks accomplishment.	Good The introduction to the topic is well written. The infos presented in the slides are complete and clear and the most of them make it easy to understand the topic.	Satisfactory The topic's introduction and the general content of the slides are written in a simple way, sometimes also missing of parts of the task's requests.	Poor The introduction and the general content of the slides are not complete at all and demonstrate lack of originality and clarity.
Comparison of two biomes	Excellent The comparison between the two biomes has been done in an excellent way: there is a complete analysis of climate, flora and fauna with a clear final conclusion.	Good The biomes have been well compared and the analysis is clear and complete.	Satisfactory The comparison has been done in a superficial way, letting out the analysis of some data. There isn't a clear conclusion of the comparison.	Poor The comparison between the two biomes is confuse and not complete.
Answering questions	Excellent The topic is well known and there is an excellent competence in answering any question about the presented topic using a huge variety of vocabulary.	Good The student is able to answer the asked questions about the topic in a good and complete way.	Satisfactory Some questions are not answered or are answered superficially.	Poor The student is not able to answer the questions with clarity.

Keywords:

assessment, geography, biomes

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric