Skip to main content

iRubric: Drama 2 Mid-Term rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Drama 2 Mid-Term 
Rubric Code: TX2728
By caraschwimer
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Drama II
  Excellent

(N/A)

Emerging

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Fair

(N/A)

Not Acceptable

(N/A)

Creative Introduction

Excellent

Student gave name, part he will be playing, author, and title of the piece. Student gave intro in an enthusiastic manner that caught the audience's interest.
Emerging

Student gave name, part he will be playing, author, and title of piece.
Good

Student gave some information using energy.
Fair

Student some information without energy.
Not Acceptable

Student did not give introduction.
Projection/Clarity

Excellent

Student's speaking was perfectly clear. Student projected his voice.
Emerging

Student had a nice speaking voice.
Good

Student needs to work on either projection or clarity.
Fair

It was difficult to both hear or understand the student.
Not Acceptable

Student could not be understood or heard in the monologue.
Poise

Excellent

Student was completly poised during performance. Student had confident entrance and exit. Student was not distracted.
Emerging

Student was confident and focused.
Good

Student showed little nervousness. Student was focused.
Fair

Student showed great nervousness but was able to get through performance.
Not Acceptable

Student was distracted. Student did not have a confident entrance or exit.
Timing

Excellent

Student had flawlwss comedic timing. Student used every opportunity to create a comedice effect.
Emerging

Student succeeded in having comedic timing in the monologue.
Good

Student obviously tried to use comedic timing in the monologue.
Fair

Student's use of comedic timing needs work.
Not Acceptable

Student did not have comedic timing.
Memorization

Excellent

Student was totally memorized and did not stumble to remember the words.
Emerging

Student was memorized but had to call for a line once.
Good

Student had to call for a line two times.
Fair

Student had to call for a line three times.
Not Acceptable

Student was not memorized or student had to call for a line over three times.
Characterization

Excellent

Student flourished in using characterization to enhance the scene. Student used movement that enhanced the character.
Emerging

Student showed great effort in trying to use characterization to enhance the scene. Student's movement was motivated.
Good

Student made obvious choices in showing characterization. Student's movement was appropriate to the scene.
Fair

Student showed little characterization. Student's movement was not motivated.
Not Acceptable

Student did not use characterization. Student did not use movement.




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243