iRubric: Dante's Inferno Group Project (individual) rubric

The student's writing reflects an insightful and deep understanding of the canto(s). All requirements are met, going above and beyond the basic requirements. Overall the analysis reflects a deep understanding of the text as well as the assignment.

The student's analysis reflects a basic understanding of the canto(s). All requirements are met, reflecting a basic understanding of the text as well as the assignment.

The student's analysis does not reflect a basic understanding of the canto(s). Problem areas could be in the understanding of the text and/or the assignment. One or two requirements are either left out or completely lacking in an understanding of the text and/or assignment.

The student's analysis is lacking in many or all areas of the text and/or assignment. Many requirements are missing or lacking in understanding. Overall, the analysis may reflect a lack of effort or understanding in all areas.

The art summary of the canto(s) is concise, and offers a critical assessment of the canto(s). The summary/review expertly connects the art to the canto(s) and analyzes the relevancy of the artist's depiction of the canto. Excellent choice of artwork. Overall, art review shows a deep understanding of the literature as well as the art.

The art summary is concise, and mostly offers a critical assessment of the canto(s). The review does a good job of connecting the art to the cantos. In addition, the review does a good job of showing the relevancy of the artist's depiction of the canto(s). Good choice of art depiction of canto. Overall, art review shows a basic understanding of both literature and assignment.

The art summary is lacking in one or two areas: the summary may be unnecessarily wordy, or the review mostly summarizes the art work rather than analyzing the connection between art work and the canto(s). There is little analysis of relevancy between art and canto(s). The chosen art depiction of canto only somewhat connects to the canto. Overall, the art review does not show a basic understanding of text and assignment.

Many areas are lacking: there is no connection between art and canto(s), the review summarizes instead of analyze, shows little understanding of literature and assignment.

Excellent job! There are no errors in spelling and grammar.

Good job! There are a few errors in spelling and grammar, but not enough to get in the way of meaning.

Fair job. There are several errors in spelling and grammar that interfere with the clarity and meaning of writing.

There is evidence of many errors in spelling and grammar. As a result, the errors interfere with clarity and meaning.