Skip to main content

iRubric: Civics Presentations rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Civics Presentations 
Every student will present a 25 minute presentation to the class regarding a topic of their choosing. The students will also be asked to present a paper and bibliography reflecting the information in their presentation.
Rubric Code: T6WX54
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: History  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Civics Presentation - Teacher
This section of the rubric scores the actual student presentation
  Excellent

9 pts

Good

6 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

0 pts

Effective Use of Technology
This sections review key aspects that are critical when discussing technology
Ease of reading

Enter description

Excellent

Font is large and text is minimal. Contrast between the background and font color makes reading easy.
Good

Font is large and text is minimal. However, there is little contrast between the background and font color.
Fair

Contrast is present between the background and font color, but there is too much text and it is small.
Poor

Too much text and it is small. There is no contrast between the background and font color.
Well organized

Enter description

Excellent

Technology flows well from section to section. Each section is related and connected.
Good

There are minor issues in the flow of information, but sections are related and connected.
Fair

There are major issues in the flow and areas where the sections are not related or connected.
Poor

Lack of organization. Technological pieces are thrown together without any obvious connections.
Engaging technology

Enter description

Excellent

Incorporates appropriate and relevant images, videos and hyperlinks.
Good

Minimal use of appropriate and relevant images, videos and hyperlinks.
Fair

Use of images, videos and hyperlinks, but they are not appropriate or relevant to the presentation.
Poor

Lack of supporting images, videos and hyperlinks.
Use of technology

Excellent

Technology works properly.
Good

Technology has minor glitches.
Fair

Technology has major glitches.
Poor

No technology is present.
Effective use of resources
Incorporates a wide variety

Excellent

Use of 3 or more types of resources in their presentation (audio, video, visuals, tangible items, personal reflection, interviews, etc.). At least one MUST be tangible.
Good

Uses 2 types of resources in their presentation (audio, video, visuals, tangible items, personal reflections, interviews, etc.). At least one is tangible.
Fair

Uses one resource in their presentation (audio, video, visuals, tangible items, personal reflections, interviews, etc.) No tangible items included.
Poor

No additional resources other than basic presentation (PowerPoint or Prezi).
Quality of materials

Excellent

Resources are relevant to topic, engaging and purposeful.
Good

Resources are purposeful but non-engaging.
Fair

Resources are engaging but not purposeful.
Poor

Resources serve no purpose and are not engaging.
Effective communication skills
Voice

Excellent

Appropriate voice level and speed.
Good

Infrequent moments of low voice level or excessive speed.
Fair

Frequent moments of low voice level or excessive speed.
Poor

Voice is not audible due to level and/or speed.
Ease of presentation

Excellent

Absence of excessive "um", "like", "and", etc. Lack of fidgeting while speaking.
Good

Infrequent use of "um", "like", "and", etc. Minor fidgeting while speaking.
Fair

Frequent use of "um", "like", "and", etc. Frequent fidgeting while speaking.
Poor

Constant use of "um", "like", "and", etc. or fidgeting while presenting.
Presentation Timing

Excellent

Presentation is between 22-27 minutes
Good

Presentation is 21-19 minutes long.
Fair

Presentation is under 15 to 18 minutes.
Poor

Presentation is under 14 minutes.
Well-prepared

Excellent

Student is well-rehearsed and confident with the material.
Good

Student requires some prompting from note cards.
Fair

Students requires frequent prompting from note cards.
Poor

Student struggles with recollection and reads from note cards constantly.
Effective Content
Information

Excellent

Information is historically accurate and research supported.
Good

Information contains minor errors in historical accuracy, but is research supported.
Fair

Information contains major errors in historical accuracy, with lack of supported research.
Poor

Information is not accurate or research supported.
Completeness of information

Excellent

Information flows well, is thorough and key points are covered.
Good

Key points are covered but the information does not flow well.
Fair

Lack of continuity with information and missing some key points.
Poor

No continuity with information and is missing key points.
Creativity

Excellent

Presentation is creative and offers a "personalized" perspective on the information.
Good

Presentation has creative moments, but the "personalized" perspective is not consistent through out the entire paper.
Fair

Paper has minimal creative moments, but does not offer a different, "personalized" perspective.
Poor

Paper is not creative.
Preparation meetings - Mrs. Keinle
Student meeting

Excellent

Meeting is scheduled in a timely manner and the student is prepared.
Good

Meeting is scheduled in a timely manner but the student is missing some of the presentation.
Fair

Meeting is not scheduled in a timely manner and the student is missing some of the presentation
Poor

No meeting is scheduled.
Written Presentation
  Excellent

20 pts

Good

13 pts

Fair

6 pts

Poor

0 pts

Format of paper

Excellent

Paper is written in 12 point font and double spaced.
Good

Paper is written in 12 point font but not double spaced.
Fair

Paper is double spaced but not written in 12 point font
Poor

Paper is written in multiple size fonts and not double spaced.
Content

Excellent

Information is historically accurate and is a complete reflection of the student presentation.
Good

Information is historically accurate but does not adequately reflect the student presentation.
Fair

Information has historical inaccuracies, but reflects the student presentation.
Poor

Information is historically inaccurate and does not reflect the student presentation.
Writing

Excellent

Paper is well written and flows well. Paper contains minimal grammar and punctuation errors, making it easy to read.
Good

Paper contains minimal grammar and punctuation errors, but does not flow well. Paragraph transitions are choppy and word choice needs improvement.
Fair

Paper is well written and flows well. However, there are frequent grammar and punctuation errors, making it difficult to read.
Poor

Paper does not flow well. There are frequent grammar and punctuation errors. Paragraph transitions are choppy and word choice needs improvement.
Turn it In

Excellent

Paper is submitted via Turn it In and an originality report is attached to the paper.
Good

Paper is submitted to Turn it In but no originality report is attached to the final paper.
Fair

Paper is submitted to Turn it In late and no originality report is available.
Poor

Paper is not submitted to Turn it In.
Resources

Excellent

Student uses a variety of resources, including a minimum of three books.
Good

Student uses a variety of resources, including a two books.
Fair

Student uses a variety of resources, including one book.
Poor

Student only uses the internet as a resource.
Bibliography

Excellent

Bibliography is present and in MLA format.
Good

Bibliography is present, but contains minor MLA errors.
Fair

Bibliography is present, but contains frequent MLA errors.
Poor

No bibliography is present.
Student Evaluation
  Excellent

27 pts

Good

18 pts

Fair

9 pts

Poor

0 pts

Engagement of Presentation

Excellent

Presentation was engaging and creative.
Good

Presentation was engaging but lacked creativity.
Fair

Presentation was creative but not engaging.
Poor

Presentation did not engage student listeners and contained no creativity.
Knowledge

Excellent

Student was knowledgeable regarding the information presented.
Good

Student was knowledgeable but struggled to convey information effectively.
Fair

Student had gaps in knowledge base and struggled to convey information effectively.
Poor

Student lacked the necessary knowledge to present effectively.




Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n224