- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: xEV A02 Risk rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
xEV A02 Risk Generic Research Writing Based Rubric The student will gain an understanding of the risk involved in starting and running a business and how to deal with risk. Rubric Code: T36W96 By wardirvin Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Accounting Type: Writing Grade Levels: 9-12

Risk Essay
	Excellent 100 pts	Good 88 pts	Fair 78 pts	Poor 70 pts	No Effort 0 pts
Content 40 %	Excellent Contract included all six key points. Research uncovered additional legal considerations that were then addressed	Good Contract included all six key points.	Fair Contract included four or five key points.	Poor Contract included two or three key points	No Effort One or no key points were addressed.
Thoroughness 30 %	Excellent All components of each key point are clearly identified. Full descriptions are given for more than the six key points described in assignment.	Good All components of each key point are clearly identified. Full descriptions are given.	Fair Components of four or five key points are clearly identified. Fair descriptions are given.	Poor Components of two or three key points are clearly identified. Poor descriptions are given.	No Effort Components of one or no key points are identified.
Writing - Grammar 15 %	Excellent Original text with no spelling and/or grammar errors	Good Original text with up to two spelling and/or grammar errors	Fair Original text with up to four spelling and/or grammar errors	Poor Original text up to six and/or grammar errors	No Effort More than six spelling and/or grammar errors
Writing - Organization 10 %	Excellent All key points and associated components have logical and orderly flow of facts.	Good All but two key points and associated components have logical and orderly flow of facts.	Fair Fewer than half key points and associated components have logical and orderly flow of facts.	Poor Key points are described in a confusing manner with little organization.	No Effort No attempt was made
Citations 5 %	Excellent All external references were correctly identified and had footnotes. Footnotes followed APA Guidles 100%	Good Up to 80% of the external references were correctly identified. Footnotes mostly followed APA Guidelines.	Fair Up to 50% of the external references were correctly identified. Footnotes mostly followed APA Guidelines 100%	Poor Less than 50% of external referencers were correctly identified. Footnotes somewhat APA Guidelines	No Effort No citations given.