iRubric: Microteaching rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Microteaching

A rubric for the microteaching sessions that will be utilized throughout the course.

Rubric Code: T247X46

By Carolita2023

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: Graduate

Microteaching
	Superior 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Poor 2 pts	Comments (N/A)
Planning	Superior The PST constructed well-developed, comprehensive lesson plans that outline overall objectives, procedure, assessment techniques and closure. All pieces flow together and provide adequate transition.	Good Lesson plans contain objectives, procedures, assessments and closure – but some are better developed than others. Transition components may need to be addressed.	Fair Lesson plans tap into the basic objectives and procedures, but little or no assessment or closure components are included. Some disorganization in the prepared lesson plan.	Poor Lesson plan not submitted or does not connect to objectives, procedures, assessments or closure. Structure of lesson plan is difficult to ascertain and is either vague or missing.	Comments
Integration of Visual Aids/Technology/Resources	Superior The PST seamlessly integrates appropriate technology/resources into the lesson. Technology/resources chosen significantly enhance lesson and connect directly to learning objectives. The PST is able to utilize technology/resources with a very high level of proficiency.	Good Lesson incorporates technology/resources effectively, but are“forced” or awkward in its integration. General connection to overall lesson objectives, but not all are fully defined and/or integrated. The PST demonstrates proficient use of the selected technology/visual aids.	Fair Selected technology/resources are provided, but are external to the overall lesson objectives and structure. Technology /resources do not enhance lesson, and may detract from overall learning objectives. The PST does not demonstrate suitable level of ability with selected technology/resources	Poor Technology /resource component either not included or is contrary to stated lesson objectives. Utilization of technology/resources reduces or eliminates effective learning within the lesson. The PST is unable to utilize technology/resources nor demonstrate his/her knowledge about the selected technology.	Comments
Lesson Delivery	Superior The PST presents lesson materials in a very clear and concise manner that focuses on lesson objectives. The PST speaks at an appropriate volume and seeks to reduce or eliminate distractions that may impact student learning.	Good The PST delivers lesson in an effective and manageable manner. There is a loose connection to learning objectives throughout the lesson. The PST is occasionally difficult to hear and/or understand.	Fair The PST provides lesson material in a static and not-fully effective manner. Some disconnection regarding lesson objectives and lesson delivery. He/she is frequently difficult to hear or understand.	Poor Lesson delivery is not present or not comprehensible. No connection to lesson topic or objectives is evident.	Comments
Individualization/Special Inclusion	Superior Specific initiatives and procedures are developed and presented in order to provide individualized learning opportunities for students. Special focus includes EFL population, students with concentration issues and gifted student populations.	Good General strategies are developed and discussed to support effective learning of differentiated groups of students. Not all strategies are implemented and/or discussed. Key population segments are identified and addressed.	Fair Numerous populations are discussed, but lesson plan does not include modification for these various groups. No specific strategies are developed for key population groups.	Poor No modifications or plans for individualization are developed or discussed. All students are presented identical lesson procedures and assessments.	Comments
Expectations about the microteaching session	Superior The PST exceeds general rubric guidelines and surpasses instructor expectations. The PST provides new avenues of thought and pedagogy through the microlesson process.	Good The PSTmeets general rubric guidelines and attempts to surpass instructor expectations. Effective use of existing and/or provided materials.	Fair The PST meets minimum rubric guidelines in most categories. The PST limits efforts to assignment description and guidelines.	Poor The PSTdid not meet expectations in any portion of the assignment. His/her performance was well below instructor expectations.	Comments

Keywords:

microteaching

Subjects:

Education

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric