- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Energy Transfer labs rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Energy Transfer labs Energy Transfer labs Rubric Code: SX85WW7 By drjgarcia Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Assignment Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

Energy transfer labs Enter rubric description
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Organization Enter criteria description	Poor No organization, difficult to read and understand sections, work not split at all into different areas. No sub-headings or titles used	Fair Some attempt to split labs into sections, but poorly organized	Good Titles for each lab; well-organized but still could use some extra formatting	Excellent Excellent use of titles/sub-headings, well constructed tables for each lab, data well organized and presented
Grammar Enter criteria description	Poor Poorly written with many errors in spelling, style and use of words	Fair Decent - but enough errors that it distracts the reader. poor choice of words and style	Good Good - well written with only minor errors, nothing that distracts too much	Excellent Error -free! You are ready to publish the great American novel
Energy pathways Enter criteria description	Poor No transfer pathway listed	Fair A rudimentary rubric, but hard to work out which energy forms are appropriate for each one	Good Good - the main energy pathways are listed for each lab, not really explained but at least included	Excellent Full, thoughtful energy transfer pathways listed for each lab, with even an explanation of each one
Questions	Poor No answers given for the questions at the end of each lab	Fair Some answers given, but some missing or incomplete	Good Every answer attempted, though some may be rather inaccurate or off base	Excellent Good, full, accurate answers for each question, even going beyond the minimum requirements and adding more detail
Lab details	Poor Missing a significant amount of information or data on the labs that you did. Not following the directions and reporting what you observed	Fair Some missing information or some sketchy or inacurrate data. Confusing details about your observations	Good Good, fairly full lab observations and details. You have attempted and reported on each activity	Excellent Excellent, full and informative observations, including all data, perhaps even adding thoughtful ideas beyond ordinary requirements
Original lab	Poor Missing or clearly copied from somewhere else with no original contribution from you	Fair Fairly good, but clearly not completely original, or an experiment very similar to one in the lab packet, perhaps missing further questions	Good Good - a lab that seems to have your original stamp on it, well written and including further questions	Excellent Great - a lab which we could try in class, significantly different from the 7 we did, original and creative