Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Marketing Plan Group Project Presentation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Marketing Plan Group Project Presentation
Marketing Plan Group Project Presentation
Evaluation criteria for Group Marketing Plan Presentation
Rubric Code:
SX46WW6
By
profman54
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Business
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Criteria
Maximum Grade for Assignment: 200 Points
Poor
(N/A)
Satisfactory
(N/A)
Excellent
(N/A)
Executive Summary
10 pts.
Poor
The executive summary contains mostly unnecessary or trivial information, therefore, it is inadequate. (5)
Satisfactory
The executive summary includes most, but not all of the critical elements of the marketing plan. Some of the information provided in the summary is unnecessary or trivial to understanding the plan. (7)
Excellent
The executive summary clearly communicates the critical elements of the marketing plan so that it reads as a stand-alone document. The length of the executive summary is sufficient to cover the critical information. (10)
Mission
10 pts.
Poor
Has no mission statement or statement is not distinctive. (5)
Satisfactory
Mission statement is brief, memorable, and distinctive. The purpose of the business or product is stated but it lacks clarity or does not include the primary functions or activities of the plan. (7)
Excellent
Mission statement is brief, memorable, and distinctive. The purpose of the of the business or product is clearly stated and it indicates the primary functions or activities of the plan. (10)
Environment/Market Situation
20 pts.
Poor
Little or no detail provided. (10)
Satisfactory
Defines size of market, share among relevant players, positioning of competitors and advantages/disadvantages of competing brands. (15)
Excellent
A definitive assessment that defines size of market, share among relevant players, positioning of competitors and advantages/disadvantages of competing brands. Utilizes key insights from primary or secondary sources. Provides qualified (20)
Competitive Activity & Dangers
10 pts.
Poor
Little or no detail provided. (5)
Satisfactory
Provides a general assessment of competitive activity, competitor strength, and potential strategic actions that these competitors could take against you. (7)
Excellent
An exceptional assessment of competitive activity, competitor strength, and potential strategic actions that these competitors could take against you. Utilizes primary or secondary sources. Shows insight into possible strategic actions that capitalize on inherent strengths. (10)
Group Dynamics
10 pts.
Poor
Poor coordination/preparation. Easy to distinguish contributors from non-contributors among group members. (5)
Satisfactory
Good coordination/preparation. All members actively participate and appear comfortable with the subject matter. (7)
Excellent
Outstanding coordination/preparation. All members actively participate and appear very comfortable with the subject matter. Engages audience with outstanding diction/grammar. (10)
Objective
10 pts.
Poor
Marketing goals and objectives are missing or those that are identified are not quantified or are inappropriate. (5)
Satisfactory
Linkage of marketing objectives and goals to company/organization mission is not clearly stated. Some of the objectives and goals are unclear and/or not appropriately quantified. (7)
Excellent
The marketing objectives and goals are clearly related to the company/organization mission. Objectives and goals are clearly stated and appropriately quantified. (10)
Product/Service Description
15 pts.
Poor
Service and/or product description is missing. (5)
Satisfactory
Service and/or product description is stated, but somewhat unclear. (15)
Excellent
Service and/or product description is clearly stated and appropriate. Actual samples either in person or visually shared during presentation. (15)
Target Audience/Segment
15 pts.
Poor
Little or no detail provided. (5)
Satisfactory
Provides a general assessment that identifies the position of each brand and its target market. (10)
Excellent
An outstanding assessment that identifies the position of each brand and its target market, utilizing a combination of primary and secondary sources. (15)
Pricing Strategy
15 pts.
Poor
Objectives for pricing and positioning are missing. More than one obvious tactic is missing. Very little detail on specific tactics is provided. Tactics are unclear and hard to understand. (5)
Satisfactory
The objectives of pricing management are stated, but somewhat unclear. Most of the tactics are thoroughly and clearly identified, but one obvious tactic is missing. Some detail on tactics is missing, hindering understanding. (10)
Excellent
The objectives of pricing management are clearly stated and appropriate. Tactics for managing price are thoroughly and clearly identified and reasoned. Sufficient detail about tactics is provided. (15)
Promotion Strategy
15 pts.
Poor
Promotion strategy and positioning is missing, or, if identified, does not seem appropriate given the product/service description and. Positioning statement(s) is missing. (5)
Satisfactory
Based on the product/service description the promotion strategy is identified but not described in enough detail. Positioning statement(s) is provided but not explained. (10)
Excellent
Based on the product/service description, the promotion strategy is appropriately identified and described. A positioning statement is identified and explained. (15)
Proposal
30 pts.
Poor
Proposal not provided or very little detail on specific tactics is provided. Proposal is unclear and hard to understand. (10)
Satisfactory
Most of the proposals are thoroughly and clearly identified, but one obvious tactic is missing. Some detail about the proposal is missing, hindering understanding. (20)
Excellent
Tactics for a proposal are thoroughly and clearly identified and reasoned. When necessary, sufficient detail about proposal is provided, making it easier to understand the scope of the proposal. (30)
Subjects:
Business
Types:
Assessment
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Business rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.