iRubric: Torticollis Inservice rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Torticollis Inservice

This rubric is being developed to help determine how successful a group of therapists and therapy assistants learn information that a Physical Therapist presents about treatment of torticollis in infants.

Rubric Code: SX3X745

By ceodeh

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Medical

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: Graduate

Treatment of Torticollis in Infants
	Excellent 3 pts	Good 2 pts	Fair 1 pts	Poor 0 pts
Differential Diagnosis	Excellent The learner identifies three conditions similar to congenital muscular torticollis and compares/contrasts symptoms needed for differential diagnosis	Good The learner identifies two conditions similar to congenital muscular torticollis and compares/contrasts symptoms needed for differential diagnosis.	Fair The learner identifies one condition similar to congenital muscular torticollis and compares/contrasts symptoms needed for differential diagnosis.	Poor The learner is unable to identify conditions similar to congenital muscular torticollis nor is able to provide information regarding differential diagnosis
Muscle Identification	Excellent The learner correctly identifies the motions affected by torticollis, the muscles performing these motions, and accurate range of motion measurements for these motions.	Good The learner correctly identifies the motions affected by torticollis, but is unable to identify the muscles performing these motions, and has difficulty providing accurate range of motion measurements for these motions.	Fair The learner is only able to identify one motion affected by torticollis, and may or may not identify the muscles responsible for this motion. Range of motion measurements are not attempted due to lack of knowledge of correct motions or muscles.	Poor The learner is unable to provide information regarding motions affecting torticollis, muscles responsible for the motion, and is unable to perform range of motion measurements.
Functional Activities	Excellent The learner selects three functional activities which promotes sidebending and rotation, in supine, prone, and sitting.	Good The learner selects 1-2 functional activities which promotes sidebending and rotation, in supine, prone, and/or sitting.	Fair The learner is only able to select functional activities to promote sidebending and/or rotation and all positions are not included in the selection.	Poor The learner is unable to select any functional activity promoting sidebending and/or rotation in any position.
Strengthening Activities	Excellent The learner selects three strengthening activities and is able to identify the muscle groups involved in the activity.	Good The learner selects two strengthening activities and is able to identify the muscle groups involved in the activity.	Fair The learner selects only one strengthening activity and may or may not identify the muscle groups involved in the activity.	Poor The learner is unable to identify any strengthening activity or the muscle groups involved.
Learning Styles	Excellent The learner effectively compares and contrasts his/her learning style with that of the instructor and gives appropriate constructive criticism for how to improve the in-service for a future presentation.	Good The learner is able to give one or two similarities or differences in the learning styles of the learner and instructor and gives constructive criticism on how to improve the in-service for a future presentation.	Fair The learner is able to tell if his/her learning style is different than the instructors, but is unable to give effective criticism for how improve the in-service for a future presentation.	Poor The learner is unable to compare/contrast his/her learning style with that of the instructor and make no attempt to effectively critique the in-service for a future presentation.

Subjects:

Medical

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric