iRubric: Intro to Computer Science Watson Design Project Rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Intro to Computer Science Watson Design Project Rubric

Intro to Computer Science Human Computation Project Rubric

Rubric Code: SX3A326

By timbarron

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Science

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: 9-12

CS Student Presentations
	Exceeds Standard (N/A)	Meets Standard (N/A)	Near Standard (N/A)	Does Not Meet Standard (N/A)
VOG - Communication EMNB == 4321	Exceeds Standard Speaks clearly and confidently(volume, pace, articulation) Meaningfully connects to the audience (eye contact, gesture, body language). Uses inflection, pauses, accentuation, and word choice strategically. Fully engages the audience.	Meets Standard Speaks clearly (volume, pace, articulation) Connects to the audience (eye contact, gesture, body language). Uses inflection, pauses, accentuation, and word choice strategically. Engages the audience.	Near Standard Speaks somewhat clearly (volume, pace, articulation) Has some connection with the audience (eye contact, gesture, body language). Somewhat engaging.	Does Not Meet Standard Speaks with little clarity(volume, pace, articulation) Limited connection with the audience (eye contact, gesture, body language). Not engaging.
VOG - Organization and Preparation EMNB == 4321	Exceeds Standard Presenter is ready to go with no glitches. Presentation is well organized and completed within allotted time frame. Presenter has clearly practiced well and makes good use of notes.	Meets Standard Presenter is ready to go. Presentation is well organized and completed within allotted time frame. Presenter has practiced and makes use of notes.	Near Standard Presenter was not quite ready to start. Presentation is organized in some sections but may not meet allotted time frame. Presenter needs more practice and/or needs to use notes.	Does Not Meet Standard Presenter not ready to go at start. Difficult to follow presentation due to lack or organization and/or does not meet allotted time. Presenter needs much more practice. No notes used.
VOG - Media/Visuals EMNB == 4321	Exceeds Standard Uses media innovatively to enhance what you say. Maximizes use of images and sound. Minimizes text.	Meets Standard Uses media to enhance what you say. Maximizes use of images and sound. Minimizes text.	Near Standard Attempts to use media innovatively to enhance what you say. Maximizes use of images and sound. Minimizes text.	Does Not Meet Standard Does not use media effectively. Too much text for audience to read.
VOG - Think Critically: AI Argument EMNB == 4321	Exceeds Standard Exceeds standard per CER rubric	Meets Standard Meets standard per CER rubric	Near Standard Near standard per CER rubric	Does Not Meet Standard Below standard per CER rubric
CS Content - AI Purpose Knwl. Rules 20 points	Exceeds Standard AI's purpose is clearly stated and explained. Sources of knowledge that have been stored in AI's memory were clearly articulated. Rules that AI knows have been clearly stated and explained. Connection between stored knowledge, rules, and purpose of AI is clear. Either the AI purpose, knowledge, the rules, or the connection between them stands out as exemplary. (20 points)	Meets Standard AI's purpose is clearly stated and explained. Sources of knowledge that have been stored in AI's memory were clearly articulated. Rules that AI knows have been clearly stated and explained. Connection between stored knowledge, rules, and purpose of AI is clear. (18 points)	Near Standard AI's purpose is stated but is not clear. Attempt made to explain knowledge stored in AI and rules AI knows. Connection exists between all aspects of AI but connection may not be clear. (16 points)	Does Not Meet Standard AI purpose, knowledge stored in AI and/or rules AI knows are missing or very unclear. (13 points)
CS Content - AI Machine Learning 20 points	Exceeds Standard AI clearly receives relevant examples and uses these to learn. The demonstration clearly shows machine learning in action. The machine learning process is very innovative. (20 points)	Meets Standard AI receives relevant examples and uses these to learn. The demonstration clearly shows machine learning in action. (18 points)	Near Standard Attempt made for AI to receive examples and use these to learn. The demonstration attempts to show machine learning in action. (16 points)	Does Not Meet Standard Machine learning is not demonstrated. (13 points)
CS Content - Design Process 10 points	Exceeds Standard The software design process is evident in your work together. Problem is stated with clear and well articulated requirements. Multiple strong ideas brainstormed. Solution is well developed and well presented. Reflection is thoughtful and thorough. (10 points)	Meets Standard The software design process can be seen in your work together. Problem is stated with requirements. Multiple ideas brainstormed. Solution is articulated and presented. Reflection is thoughtful. (9 points)	Near Standard Attempt made at all aspects of the software design process. (8 points)	Does Not Meet Standard Does not use the software process in a significant way. (6 points)

Subjects:

Science

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric