iRubric: SGA Officer rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

SGA Officer

Evaluate student officers to measure their level of dedication.

Rubric Code: S77C9A

By marystevens95

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Political Science

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: 9-12

Enter rubric title
	Excellent 5 pts	Above Average 4 pts	Average 3 pts	Below Average 2 pts	Low 1 pts	Very Low 0 pts
Weighted GPA	Excellent 4.5+-4.0	Above Average 3.9-3.5	Average 3.4-3.0	Below Average 2.9-2.5	Low 2.4-2.0	Very Low Below 2.0
Critical Thinking/Decision Making	Excellent -Student is knowledgeable about the decision making and problem solving process with little or no adult guidance. Results are evident and used to continue the process -Proactively analyzes and diagnoses problems and addresses them with creative solution	Above Average -Student is knowledgeable about the decision making and problem solving process. Decisions are discussed, evaluated, and followed through with minimal adult guidance. Results are evidence -Has capacity to develop and sustain long term strategic plans with effective solutions.	Average -Student is knowledgeable about decision making process but have difficult getting results. Seeks adult guidance often. -Makes appropriate decisions based on policies, students, and data.	Below Average -Student is beginning to utilize a process of decision making with adult encouragement.	Low -Student has minimal knowledge of the the decision making and problem solving process	Very Low -Student is not knowledgeable of the decision making and problem solving process.
Student Engagement	Excellent -Moderate level of student participation within other clubs and organizations.	Above Average -Sporadic level of student participation within other clubs and organizations.	Average -High level of student participation within other clubs and organizations.	Below Average -Extremely high level of student participation within other clubs and organizations.	Low -Minimal level of student participation within other clubs and organizations.	Very Low -Low level of student participation within other clubs and organizations
Popular Votes	Excellent -Student received the majority of popular votes from the student body.	Above Average -Student received the second highest amount of popular votes from the student body.	Average -Student received the third highest amount of popular votes from the student body.	Below Average -Student received the fourth highest amount of popular votes from the student body.	Low -Student received the fifth highest amount of popular votes from the student body.	Very Low -Student received the sixth highest amount of popular votes from the student body.
Ability to Prioritize	Excellent -Student has developed habits of consistently relying on a schedule planning system that integrates time and task management to effectively minimize interruptions and maximize productivity and punctuality.	Above Average -Student uses a daily calendar system that is integrated with their task management system. It may lack consistency and be limited in scope	Average	Below Average -Student uses a month to month calendar to note major events	Low -Student uses a system of lists that are accessible	Very Low -Student has no means of tracking tasks, projects, or daily priorities
Communication Skills	Excellent -Utilizes online communication to further their study, ask and answer questions, and go beyond the confines of the classroom.	Above Average -Articulates -Presents ideas clearly -Shows skill in dealing with difficult or delicate situations, keeping other's feelings in mind	Average -Present self with composure -Breaks things down on everyone's level -Avoid vague words	Below Average -Ask questions for clarification -Has good social skills -Controls thought flow and speech	Low -Listens before speaking -Speaks at an appropriate volume -Gives everyone a chance to speak	Very Low -Fails to maintain audience's attentions -Seldom makes eye contact with intended audience -Pays attention to speaker(s)
Interview	Excellent -Student was professionally dressed, and exhibited excellent manners. -All questions were answered honestly and thoughtfully using adult words and tone.	Above Average -Student was professionally dressed, and exhibited excellent manners. -Most questions were answered honestly and thoughtfully using adult words and tone.	Average -Student was professionally dressed, and exhibited acceptable manners. -Few questions were answered honestly and thoughtfully using adult words and tone.	Below Average -Student was NOT professionally dressed for a job interview. -All questions were answered honestly and thoughtfully using adult words and tone.	Low -Student was NOT professionally dressed for a job interview. -Most questions were answered appropriately and thoughtfully using adult words and tone.	Very Low -Student was NOT professionally dressed for a job interview. -Few questions were answered honestly and thoughtfully using adult words and tone.

Keywords:

Student government rubric, interview, prioritize, communication skills, student engagement, critical thinking

Subjects:

Political Science

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric