iRubric: Assessment Criteria for Case Study CO304 rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Assessment Criteria for Case Study CO304

Assessment Criteria for Case Study CO205

Rubric Code: S729C7

By KatrinaTravers

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Humanities

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Component 60 %
	High Distinction 100-85% 0 pts	Distinction 84-75% 0 pts	Credit 74-65% 0 pts	Pass 64-50% (N/A)	Fail Below 50% (N/A)
Introduction 15%
5 % Introduces and succinctly clarifies the case being addressed	High Distinction Evidence of ability to interpret and understand the issues presented in the case study and summarise them succinctly and accurately.	Distinction Evidence of ability to understand and analyse the issues presented in the case study, and summarise them, but with some problems with clarity.	Credit Evidence of understanding the issues presented in the case study, and summarise them, but with many problems with clarity.	Pass Reproduced the case study details only, and many problems with clarity	Fail No evidence of ability to understand or succinctly define the case study
10 % Provides an introductory overview of the oveall direction and focus of the paper	High Distinction A succinct and clear introduction and summary of the focus of the essay is given, with no errors.	Distinction A clear introduction and summary of the focus of the essay given, with some problems with clarity and writing.	Credit An introduction and summary of the focus of the essay given, but with many problems with clarity and writing.	Pass An introduction is offered, but with some errors in clarity of what the paper will be written on, and many problems with writing.	Fail No summary of overview and focus of essay offered.
Main Body 60%
10 % Provides an overview of he unique perspectives of both the perpetrator and victim	High Distinction Evidence of ability to interpret the unique perpectives of both perpetrator and victim, and communicate them succinctly and clearly, with no errors.	Distinction Evidence of ability to understand the unique perspectives of both the perpetrator and victim, and communicate them clearly with some errors.	Credit Evidence of ability to understand the unique perspectives of both the perpetrator and victim, and communicate them but with many errors.	Pass Evidence of reproducing the unique perspectives of perpetrator and victim, but with many problems accurately communicating them.	Fail No evidence of knowledge of the unique perspectives of the perpetrator and victim.
10 % Elaborates on the needs that each client may have in the context of the situation that presnets	High Distinction Evidence of ability to interpret and elaborate on the needs of each client within the presented context, and communicate these needs succinctly and with no errors.	Distinction Evidence of ability to understand the needs of each client within the presented context, and communicate them but with some errors.	Credit Evidence of ability to understand the needs of each client within the presented context, and communicate them but with many errors.	Pass Evidence of reproducing the needs of each client within the presented context, but with many problems accurately communicating them	Fail No evidence of knowledge of the needs of each client.
5 % Clarifies duty of care to both the victim and perpetrator	High Distinction Evidence of ability to identify and apply the duty of care needs to apply to both the victim and perpetrator, and communicate this succinctly and with no errors.	Distinction Evidence of ability to understand the duty of care needs applied to both victim and perpetrator, and communicate them but with some errors.	Credit Evidence of ability to understand the duty of care needs applied to both victim and perpetrator, and communicate them but with many errors.	Pass Evidence of reproducing the duty of care needs applied to victim and perpetrator, but with many problems accurately communicating them.	Fail No evidence of knowledge of duty of care needs to either victim or perpetrator.
10 % Offers a sound understandng of appropriate interventions that could be applied to the presenting case.	High Distinction Evidence of ability to identify and modify appropriate interventions that could be applied to this case, and communicate this succinctly and with no errors.	Distinction Evidence of ability to identify appropriate interventions that could be applied to this case, and communicate these, but with some errors.	Credit Evidence of ability to identify appropriate interventions that could be applied to this case, and communicate them, but with many errors.	Pass Evidence of reproducing appropriate interventions that could be applied to this case, but with many problems accurately communicating them.	Fail No evidence of knowledge of appropriate interventions that could be applied to this case.
10 % Theories, concepts and ideas of approach chosen match effectively with the issues being faced by the clients.	High Distinction Evidence of ability to identify and modify appropriate theories, concepts and ideas to match the issues of the clients effectively, and communicate this succinctly and with no errors.	Distinction Evidence of ability to identify appropriate theories, concepts and ideas to match the issues of the clients, and communicate these, but with some errors.	Credit Evidence of ability to identify appropriate theories, concepts and ideas to match the issues of the clients, and communicate them, but with many errors.	Pass Evidence of ability to reproduce appropriate theories, concepts and ideas to match the issues of the clients, but with many problems accurately communicating them.	Fail No evidence of knowledge of appropriate theories, concepts and ideas to match the issues of the clients.
5 % Provides detail of appropriate referral pathways that could be implemented as a complement to your counselling work with the presenting case	High Distinction Evidence of ability to identify and modify appropriate referral pathways that would complement counsellors work, and communicate this succinctly and with no errors.	Distinction Evidence of ability to identify appropriate referral pathways that would complement counsellors work, and communicate these but with some errors.	Credit Evidence of ability to identify appropirate referral pathways that would complement counsellors work, and communicate them, but with many errors.	Pass Evidence of ability to reproduce appropriate referral pathways that would complement counsellors work, but with many problems accurately communicating them.	Fail No evidence of knowledge of appropriate referral pathways.
5 % Identifies potential challenges that may be faced in working through the issues of the specific case	High Distinction Evidence of ability to anticipate and solve potential challenges when working through issues of this case, and communicate this succinctly and with no errors.	Distinction Evidence of ability to anticipate potential challenges when working through the issues of this case, and communicate these, but with some errors.	Credit Evidence of ability to anticipate potential challenges when working through the issues of this case, and communicate these, but with many errors.	Pass Evidence of ability to identify potential challenges when working through the issues of this case, but with many problems accurately communicating them.	Fail No evidence of knowledge of potential challenges when working through issues of this case.
5 % Comprehensive reference to relevant literature sources are made.	High Distinction A comprehensive reference to relevant literature sources are made, at all times, with no errors.	Distinction Reference to mostly relevant literature sources are made, but with some errors.	Credit Reference to mostly relevant literature sources are made, but with many errors.	Pass Reference to some relevant literature sources are made, but not comprehensive.	Fail No evidence of sourcing and citing appropriate literature sources are found.
Conclusion 10%
5 % A succinct and precise summary of the relevant issues faced by the clients and their relevance to key theoretical ideas of approach have been made	High Distinction A succinct and precise summary of the essay, including the relevant issues, needs, interventions, and theories are given with no errors.	Distinction A succinct summary of the essay, including the relevant issues, needs, interventions, and theories are given with some errors.	Credit A succinct summary of the essay, including the relevant issues, needs, interventions, and theories are given with many errors	Pass A summary of the essay, including the relevant issues, needs, interventions, and theories are given but with many errors.	Fail No summary of essay offered.
5 % A succinct and precise summary of effective recommendations on possible follow-up paths and future directions for the clients are made.	High Distinction A succinct and precise summary of the appropriate referral pathways are given, together with appropriate recommendations and future directions, are given, with no errors.	Distinction A succinct summary of the appropriate referral pathways are given, together with recommendations and future directions, are given,with some errors.	Credit A succinct summary of the appropriate referral pathways are given, together with recommendations and future directions, are given, with many errors	Pass A summary of the referral pathways are given, together with recommendations and future directions, but with many errors.	Fail No summary of referral pathways or future directions/recommendations given.
Overall Quality of Paper 15%
10 % Quality of writing style	High Distinction Evidence of excellent essay structure, flow of argument, academic prose, grammar, punctuation, and spelling with no errors.	Distinction Evidence of good essay structure, flow of argument, academic prose, grammar, punctuation, and spelling with some errors.	Credit Evidence of satisfactory essay structure, flow of argument, academic prose, grammar, punctuation, and spelling with many errors.	Pass Evidence of some essay structure, flow of argument, academic prose, grammar, punctuation, and spelling, but with many errors.	Fail No evidence of essay structure, flow of argument, academic prose, grammar, punctuation and spelling.
5 % Use of APA formatting and referencing	High Distinction Accurate use of APA 6th ed. formatting used throughout the essay and referencing, with no errors.	Distinction Good use of APA 6th ed. formatting used throughout the essay and referencing, with some errors.	Credit Satisfactory use of APA 6th ed. formatting used throughout the essay and referencing, with many errors.	Pass Evidence of use of APA 6th ed. formatting used throughout the essay and referencing, but with many errors.	Fail No evidence of use of APA formatting.

Keywords:

case study, counselling

Subjects:

Humanities

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric