Skip to main content
iRubric: Comparing Experiences across the World rubric

iRubric: Comparing Experiences across the World rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Comparing Experiences across the World 
Compare families in 2 nations in terms of economic, demographic and social characteristics.
Rubric Code: S2WX378
By MichelleMason
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Geography  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Comparing World Experiences
Geography - Comparing the experiences for families in different parts of the world according to economic, demographic and social characteristics
  Unsatisfactory

Student has not completed the task to grade level standard

1 pts

Satisfactory

Student has completed the requirements of the task to grade level standard

2 pts

Good

Student has completed the requirements of the task to above grade level/very good standard

3 pts

Excellent

Student has completed the requirements of the task to an excellent standard, significantly above grade level expectations

4 pts

Family Characteristics

Differences in the economic, demographic and social characteristics of countries across the world (ACHASSK139)
Unsatisfactory

Limited or no evidence of understanding the different characteristics and experiences of their 2 families/nations. Multiple elements missing from their content.

(Google Earth picture, GPS and location information, world map image, life expectancy, monthly income, 5 chosen facts)
Satisfactory

Brief information was provided on all the different characteristics and experiences of their 2 families/nations.
Good

Detailed information was provided on some of the different characteristics and experiences of their 2 families/nations, while others a little brief.
Excellent

Detailed information was provided on all of the different characteristics and experiences of their 2 families/nations.
Research skills

Locate and collect relevant information and data from primary sources and secondary sources (ACHASSI123)
Unsatisfactory

Research was inaccurate. All wording taken directly from the internet. Significant help required to find and understand information and generate search terms.
Satisfactory

Research was accurate. Minor wording taken directly from the internet. Minor help required to find and understand information, or to generate search terms.
Good

Research was accurate. All wording in student's own words. No help required to find and understand information, or to generate search terms.
Excellent

N/A
Conclusions and Judgements

Interpret data and information displayed in a range of formats to identify, describe and compare distributions, patterns and trends, and to infer relationships (ACHASSI128)
Evaluate evidence to draw conclusions (ACHASSI129)
Unsatisfactory

Explanations were brief, incomplete or difficult to understand. No examples provided to justify claims. Conclusions made did not reflect or connect logically to experiences of the chosen families.
Satisfactory

Explanations were given on all areas with some examples provided to justify claims. Conclusions made reflected the experiences of the chosen families but were a little brief.
Good

Explanations were given on all areas with examples provided to justify claims. Conclusions made reflected the experiences of the chosen families.
Excellent

Explanations were given on all areas with detailed and insightful examples provided to justify claims. Conclusions made reflected the experiences of the chosen families and demonstrated in-depth thinking and the application of knowledge from the rest of the unit.
Quality of Work Product

Present ideas, findings, viewpoints and conclusions in a range of texts and modes that incorporate source materials, digital and non-digital representations and discipline-specific terms and conventions (ACHASSI133)
Unsatisfactory

Work product was poorly executed with lack of care evident in audio, visuals or both
Satisfactory

Work product demonstrated satisfactory execution of the audio and visuals. Some areas appeared to be a bit rushed or had lack of care in presentation or content, but did not affect access to knowledge
Good

Work product was of a high standard with care evident in all areas.
Excellent

Work product was of an excellent standard with efforts made to add additional details and features that would improve the viewers experience of the content - such as unique visual animations or use of more advanced tools in the app.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16