iRubric: ORAL PRESET MICROTEACH II rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

ORAL PRESET MICROTEACH II

VIDEO PRESENTATION

Final deliver Ugc

Rubric Code: S25XW89

By mruizm1

Ready to use

Private Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: Graduate

AUTHEN MATE PRESENTATION
	No presentation (N/A)	Very poor (N/A)	Poor (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Good (N/A)	Excellent (N/A)
CONTENT	No presentation No presentation (0 points)	Very poor Information presented does not correspond to the assigned topics: corrected lesson plan, strategies and authentic material selection explained and justified from the theory. Poorly developed task. (6 points)	Poor Information presented corresponds to the first lesson plan. Strategies and authentic materials were not presented. Lack of development in most of the required aspects The section with the rationale from theory was not included. Answers provided to the questions did not address the topic in any way. (12 points)	Fair Information presented corresponds partly to the corrected lesson plan. Strategies and authentic materials were also presented but not clearly. The section with the rationale from theory had limited information. Answers provided to the questions were too general and did not clearly address the topic. (18 points)	Good Information presented corresponds to the corrected lesson plan. Strategies and authentic materials were also presented and partly explained . The section with the rationale from theory had some relevant information. Answers to the questions were answered but they lacked some development. (24 points)	Excellent Information presented corresponds to the corrected lesson plan. Strategies and authentic materials were also presented and explained from the theory. The section with the rationale from theory was also included. Answers for questions were sound and clear. (30 points)
FORMAT	No presentation No presentation (0 points)	Very poor The visual aids are undereveloped and/or unclear. The oral presentation does not show turn taking and or defined roles. (2 points)	Poor The visual aids had only part of the required sections. It lacked balance between information and images. The oral presentation had some unnecessary interuptions and gaps.(4 points)	Fair The visual aids had most of the required sections but some of them lacked relevant information. It was fairly balanced. The oral presentation had some unnecessary interuptions and gaps..(6 points)	Good The visual aids had all of the required sections but some of them lacked relevant information. There was a good balance between information and images. Roles and for the oral presentation were clearly organised. (8 points)	Excellent The visual aids were appealing and balanced. All of the required sections were presented and had relevant information. Roles and for the oral presentation were clearly organised. (10 points)
USE OF LANGUAGE	No presentation No presentation (0 points)	Very poor Language was mainly limited and faulty. Messagase was unintelligible for most of the part. (2 points)	Poor Langauge used in both oral and written deliveries was basic but it was possible to undertand parts of the information. There were many pronunciation, grammar and/or spelling/vocabulary mistakes.(4 points)	Fair Language in both oral and written deliveries was appropriate, message was fairly conveyed. There were some pronunciation, grammar and/or spelling/ vocabulary mistakes that interfered with meaning. (6 points)	Good Language in both oral and written deliveries displayed a good command of language. The message was clearly transmited for the most part. There were some pronunciation, grammar and/or spelling/vocabulary mistakes that do not interfere with meaning. (8 points)	Excellent Language in both oral and written deliveries displayed a high command of language. The message was clearly transmited at all times. There were only a few pronunciation, grammar and/or spelling/ vocabulary mistakes that do not interfere with meaning. (10 points)

Subjects:

English

Types:

Discuss this rubric