iRubric: Lesson Evaluation rubric

The lesson was delivered asynchronously. Directions were unclear and learner had one only one mean of submitting work.

The lesson was delivered asynchronously with engaging videos, detailed directions, and a choice for the students to submit their work through videos, pictures, and word documents.

The lesson was offered both synchronously and asynchronously through live video and recordings. The students had a chance in the live meeting to ask and answer questions, and the asynchronous group could ask and answer questions through the discussion board. Directions were clearly stated and students had a choice in their submission of the assignment.

The lesson doesn't allow for collaboration among peers. There is no opportunity allotted for students to ask questions.

The lesson allows for minimal collaboration among peers through the use of the chatbox.

The lesson encourages collaboration among peers through several digital platforms. The teacher takes the role of a facilitator and is available for questions.

The lesson offered no evidence of engagement for the students. The lesson was self-directed.

The lesson offered minimal engagement through the use of videos. The lesson did not allow for interaction with peers.

The lesson offered several opportunities for engagement through the use of the chatroom, Boom Cards, and Youtube videos. The students were able to interact with their peers during several parts of the lessons.

The assessment was an activity on Seesaw with no evidence of self-completion.

The assessment was delivered through an online platform and consisted of multiple choice and True and False questions.

The assessment was delivered through an online platform and provided instant feedback to the students at the end of the test.