iRubric: Computer Science Honors Presentation Scratch Rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Computer Science Honors Presentation Scratch Rubric

Rubric Code: RX449C4

By almitahp

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Science

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: 9-12

CS Student Presentations
	Exceeds Standard 4 pts	Meets Standard 3 pts	Near Standard 2 pts	Does Not Meet Standard 1 pts
Communication	Exceeds Standard Speaks clearly and confidently(volume, pace, articulation) Meaningfully connects to the audience (eye contact, gesture, body language). Uses inflection, pauses, accentuation, and word choice strategically. Fully engages the audience.	Meets Standard Speaks clearly (volume, pace, articulation) Connects to the audience (eye contact, gesture, body language). Uses inflection, pauses, accentuation, and word choice strategically. Engages the audience.	Near Standard Speaks somewhat clearly (volume, pace, articulation) Has some connection with the audience (eye contact, gesture, body language). Somewhat engaging.	Does Not Meet Standard Speaks with little clarity(volume, pace, articulation) Limited connection with the audience (eye contact, gesture, body language). Not engaging.
Organization and Preparation	Exceeds Standard Presenter is ready to go with no glitches. Presentation is well organized and completed within allotted time frame. Presenter has clearly practiced well.	Meets Standard Presenter is ready to go. Presentation is well organized and completed within allotted time frame. Presenter has practiced.	Near Standard Presenter was not quite ready to start. Presentation is organized in some sections but may not meet allotted time frame. Presenter needs more practice.	Does Not Meet Standard Presenter not ready to go at start. Difficult to follow presentation due to lack or organization and/or does not meet allotted time. Presenter needs much more practice.
CS Content (10 Points)	Exceeds Standard Thoroughly and clearly walks us through how to play the game. Explains the most challenging part and why showing CS thinking. Gives clear example of parallelism showing CS thinking. Gives clear example of where parallelism won't work showing CS thinking. Details next steps showing CS thinking. (10 points)	Meets Standard Walks us through how to play the game. Explains the most challenging part and why showing some CS thinking. Gives example of parallelism showing some CS thinking. Gives example of where parallelism won't work showing some CS thinking. Mentions next steps. (8.5 points)	Near Standard Walks us through how to play the game. Attempts to explain the most challenging part and why showing some CS thinking. Attempts to give an example of parallelism. Attempts to give an example of where parallelism won't work showing Attempts to describe next steps. (7.5 points)	Does Not Meet Standard Walks us through how to play the game. Does not explain the most challenging part. Does not give an example of parallelism. Does not give an example of where parallelism won't work showing Does not describe next steps. (6 points)
Media	Exceeds Standard Uses media innovatively to enhance what you say. Maximizes use of images and sound. Minimizes text.	Meets Standard Uses media to enhance what you say. Maximizes use of images and sound. Minimizes text.	Near Standard Attempts to use media innovatively to enhance what you say. Maximizes use of images and sound. Minimizes text.	Does Not Meet Standard Does not use media effectively. Too much text for audience to read.

Subjects:

Science

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric