Skip to main content

iRubric: String Orchestra playing test rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
String Orchestra playing test 
String Orchestra playing test
Rubric Code: RC5W63
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Music  
Type: ePortfolio  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Performance Test
  Failing (59 & Below)

(N/A)

Below Grade Level (60-76)

(N/A)

At Beginning of Grade Level (77-89)

(N/A)

At Grade Level (90-99)

(N/A)

Above Grade Level (100)

(N/A)

Note Accuracy

Failing (59 & Below)

Music has too many errors. Needs attention.
Below Grade Level (60-76)

Several errors occur. Most of the intonation is incorrect and there are many wrong notes.
At Beginning of Grade Level (77-89)

Occasional note is missed, due to key signature, shift or accidental. Basic Tonality can be heard.
At Grade Level (90-99)

Few notes are missed. Mistakes do not detract from music. Most of the intonation is correct and there are no wrong notes.
Above Grade Level (100)

Excellent accuracy. No mistakes were made, therefore music was performed as written.
Rhythm

Failing (59 & Below)

No sense of pulse. Rhythms are incorrect. Unable to show basic understanding of Relationships between different Rhythms.
Below Grade Level (60-76)

Inconsistant pulse. Most rhythms are incorrect.
At Beginning of Grade Level (77-89)

Basic sense of pulse. Some rhythms are incorrect.
At Grade Level (90-99)

Secure pulse with minor rhythmic problems
Above Grade Level (100)

Strong sense of pulse. All rhythms performed accurately
Dynamics

Failing (59 & Below)

No distinguishable difference between any of the dynamic markings.
Below Grade Level (60-76)

A few of the dynamics are observed but most are ignored. There is little distinguishable difference between different markings and during Crescendos and decrescendos.
At Beginning of Grade Level (77-89)

Half of the dynamic markings are observed and there is some distinguishable between different markings and during difference during Half the Crescendos and decrescendos.
At Grade Level (90-99)

Most of the dynamic markings are observed and there is clear distinguishable difference during Most the Crescendos and decrescendos.
Above Grade Level (100)

All of the dynamic markings are observed and there is artistic, clear distinguishable difference during All the Crescendos and decrescendos.
Tone

Failing (59 & Below)

Poor sound. Needs more bow, better weight distribution, needs better contact point. Keep left hand secure for good sound
Below Grade Level (60-76)

Sound not developed. Keep working towards more volume and consistancy in tone
At Beginning of Grade Level (77-89)

Tone is generally consistant. Continue to expand on good bow principles
At Grade Level (90-99)

Tone is developed. Good basic use of the bow and left hand.
Above Grade Level (100)

Tone is excellent. Great use and distribution of the bow. Steady contact point, good arm weight.
Bowing

Failing (59 & Below)

Bowing is consistently backwards. Articulations are consistently ignored. Bow management, or the specific section of bow that is to be used, is consistently incorrect.
Below Grade Level (60-76)

Bowing is correct some of the time. A few of the articulations are observed but most are not. Bow management is correct some of the time.
At Beginning of Grade Level (77-89)

Bowing is correct half of the time. A few of the articulations are observed but most are not. Bow management is correct some of the time.
At Grade Level (90-99)

Bowing is correct most of the time. Most of the articulations are observed. Bow management is correct most of the time
Above Grade Level (100)

All bowings and articulations are observed. Bow management is consistently correct.



Keywords:
  • Playing Test

Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n224