iRubric: Design Project Assignment - Tech 120 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Design Project Assignment - Tech 120

This was the final project - worth 240 points. It consists of project elements as well as peer and panel reviews for points.

Rubric Code: RBCW56

By ljbarnett

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Engineering

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Design Project Rubric
	Below Average 15 pts	Average 25 pts	Superior/Excellent 30 pts
Technical Report	Below Average No TOC; missing elements to the report; does not follow style provided; grammatical and/or spelling issues	Average All components were present, but content lacked substance and was not well developed	Superior/Excellent All components were present and report was thorough and contained well developed sections
Prototype	Below Average Lacked design prototype elements - no storyboard or proof of concept included	Average Provided prototype for class review, but did not include in final presentation	Superior/Excellent Provided prototype for both class review as well as during presentation
Storyboard	Below Average Did not provide or was not aligned to design project	Average Provided but lacked detail or creativity elements	Superior/Excellent Well thought out and creative - was appropriate for the project being researched
Video	Below Average Video was not relevant to project or did not exist	Average Video was well thought out but hard to hear or quality was less than ideal - not all team members participated	Superior/Excellent Video was creative, supported the main project idea and was part of the effort by all team members
Poster - Draft and Final	Below Average Does not provide the elements required to promote the design project - mistakes or omissions present	Average Elements to promote the project are included, some mistakes present - hard to read or understand	Superior/Excellent Superior design aspect with details relevant to promote the project - easy to read and follow
Gantt Chart	Below Average Not included	Average Included but lacks details - does not align with attainable dates for project	Superior/Excellent Contains all the elements of the project - aligns with realistic dates for project implementation
Peer Evaluation	Below Average CATME was not completed for sessions 2 or 3	Average CATME was missed in either session 2 or session 3	Superior/Excellent CATME was completed for all sessions (required)
Panel Evaluation	Below Average Based on external rubric - see copies	Average Based on external rubric - see copies	Superior/Excellent Based on external rubric - see copies