- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Reconstruction Character Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Reconstruction Character Presentation Historical Figure Presentation Students will create a video presenting their assigned character's viewpoint on the success/failure of Reconstruction. Rubric Code: R2XW4BW By kueeck Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

Presentation
	Poor 0 pts	Good 1 pts	Great Meets Expectations 2 pts	Excellent Exceeds Expectations 3 pts
Presentation Voice and expressions while presenting	Poor Inaudible voice with poor expression	Good Audible voice with poor expression	Great Audible voice with good expression	Excellent Voice was strong, incorporating expression.
Character Speaks as the character in the first person (using pronouns such as "I" and "my")	Poor Does not speak as the character at all	Good Speaks as the character occasionally, but often falls out of character	Great Speaks as the character, but occasionally falls out of character	Excellent Speaks as the character consistently throughout the presentation
Introduction Explains who the character is and his/her general opinion of Reconstruction.	Poor No introductory piece is provided	Good Only one introductory piece of information is provided	Great All necessary introductory pieces of information are provided.	Excellent All necessary introductory pieces of information are provided and includes extra information that was provided with the character's background
Support Uses accurate, specific examples (from the Evaluating Reconstruction page) to support viewpoint	Poor Viewpoint was not well supported with very few examples	Good Viewpoint was supported with a few examples	Great Viewpoint was well supported with a few specific, accurate examples	Excellent Viewpoint was well supported, with many specific, accurate examples
Accuracy Information presented is historically accurate	Poor Information is not accurate	Good Information was mostly accurate with some inaccurate pieces of information	Great Information was accurate throughout presentation	Excellent Information was accurate and showed evidence of extra research