Skip to main content

iRubric: Hiroshima No Pika Essay rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Hiroshima No Pika Essay 
Rubric Code: R2W2B3
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Essay Hiroshima No Piks
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Organization

Poor

Writing lacksa clear sense of direction. Ideas, details,or events seem strung together in a loose or random fashion; there is no identifiable internal structure.
Fair

The organizational structure is strong enough to move the reader through the text without too much confusion.
Good

The organization enhances and show cases the central idea or theme. The order, structure,or presentation of information is compelling and moves the reader through the text.
Voice

Poor

The writer seems indifferent, uninvolved,or distanced from the topic and/or the audience.
Fair

The writer seems sincere but not fully engaged or involved. The result is pleasant, or even personable, but not compelling.
Good

The writer speaks directly to the reader in a way that is individual, compelling, and engaging. The writer crafts the piece with an awareness of and respect for the audience and the writing's purpose.
Word Choice

Poor

The writer demonstrates a limited vocabularyor has not searched for words to convey specific meaning.
Fair

The language is functional, even if it lacks much energy. It is easy to figure out the writer's meaning on a general level.
Good

Words convey the intended message in a precise, interesting, and natural way. The words are powerful and engaging.
Sentence Fluency

Poor

The reader has to practice quite a bit in order to give this paper a fair interpretive reading.
Fair

The text hums along with a steady beat, but tends to be more pleasant or businesslike than musical, more mechanichal than fluid.
Good

The writing has an easy flow, rhythm, and cadence. Sentences are well built, with strong and varied structure that invites expressive oral reading.
Conventions

Poor

Errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, grammar and usage, and/or paragraphing repeatedly distract the reader and make the text difficult to read.
Fair

The writer shows reasonable control over a limited range of standard writing conventions. Conventions are sometimes handled well and enhance readability, or errors are distracting and make it hard to read.
Good

The writer shows a good grasp of standard writing conventions and uses them effectively to make it easy to read. Errors are so few that just minor touch up would get this piece ready to publish.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n58